Quote (Veilside @ Sat, Mar 7 2009, 02:55pm)
That's why you get bigger sensors, also, th more MP's packed in the camera, the more interpolation happens, which can have a negative impact on image quality.
yeah that's what I read in a review on the 5D mk II too
Quote
I also think that Canon could have produced an almost-perfect (in light of current technology) DSLR had the 5D Mark II been 12-15 megapixels. The sacrifices to image quality to get 21.1 megapixels at higher ISOs are just not worth it to me.
full review here:
http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/27/canon-5d-mark-ii-vs-nikon-d700-in-depth-iso-comparison/The exact same thing could said about eos 50D I am sure I would have bought it instead of 40D if it had around 10-12Mpixel
This post was edited by Futurama on Mar 7 2009 02:59pm