d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Rate The Photo Above You > Re-re-posting
Prev12829303132124Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 1,681
Joined: Aug 26 2009
Gold: 2,578.37
Oct 22 2010 11:59am
Quote (hestJaevel @ Oct 22 2010 07:53pm)
I love those flyers, I'm pretty neutral about the picture itself in this case though

4/10

http://images4.bilddagboken.se/83/_u8/_u4/_u3/_u2/_u5/u843256/f/o/4ee437bfa6370475bb16d5bdbecf1a1ec20bd09547d249fca2a3ebf2199523a7.jpg

Actually I'm far from pro at doing flowers, those were beautiful, I used 3 candles as my light source in a dark room :)


pretty colors. the flowers are quite awesome. I dont really see the actual focal point tho. dont know where the focus lays exactly. seems like the red rose in the left bottom is the sharpest......

5/10



Member
Posts: 17,322
Joined: Apr 29 2007
Gold: 26.00
Oct 24 2010 08:53am
Quote (RecoveryChannel @ 22 Oct 2010 18:59)
pretty colors. the flowers are quite awesome. I dont really see the actual focal point tho. dont know where the focus lays exactly. seems like the red rose in the left bottom is the sharpest......

5/10


http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2010/294/6/6/66f090f2b25a086d4efcc9e2975b76e4-d3180b3.jpg


A very sharp photo but the look on the girl's face seems a bit artificial to me.

7/10

Here is mine:

Member
Posts: 1,681
Joined: Aug 26 2009
Gold: 2,578.37
Oct 24 2010 09:31am
Quote (ace07 @ Oct 24 2010 04:53pm)
A very sharp photo but the look on the girl's face seems a bit artificial to me.

7/10

Here is mine:

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4355/autumn3res.jpg


did you edit the shot? the colors and especially the sky looks really washed out and dull. not digging it. Also the contrasts look strange in this shot. 4/10



Member
Posts: 17,322
Joined: Apr 29 2007
Gold: 26.00
Oct 24 2010 09:52am
Quote (RecoveryChannel @ 24 Oct 2010 16:31)
did you edit the shot? the colors and especially the sky looks really washed out and dull. not digging it. Also the contrasts look strange in this shot. 4/10


http://upload.pure34.com/upload/night6.jpg


how do you mean washed out? Does it look like if its edited?
Member
Posts: 1,681
Joined: Aug 26 2009
Gold: 2,578.37
Oct 24 2010 10:23am
Quote (ace07 @ Oct 24 2010 05:52pm)
how do you mean washed out? Does it look like if its edited?


ye it does. and underexposed.
Member
Posts: 36,992
Joined: Jan 6 2007
Gold: 7,821.00
Oct 24 2010 10:39am
Quote (RecoveryChannel @ 24 Oct 2010 17:31)
did you edit the shot? the colors and especially the sky looks really washed out and dull. not digging it. Also the contrasts look strange in this shot. 4/10


http://upload.pure34.com/upload/night6.jpg


The one thing that draws my attention here is the traffic light in the center of the picture.
Maybe that's because it's the one subject that is making a contour in the picture.
But, the b/w in itself is perfect, exposure as well, I just wish the traffic light didn't take so much space in this picture..

6/10

Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Oct 24 2010 10:59am
Quote (hestJaevel @ Oct 24 2010 12:39pm)
The one thing that draws my attention here is the traffic light in the center of the picture.
Maybe that's because it's the one subject that is making a contour in the picture.
But, the b/w in itself is perfect, exposure as well, I just wish the traffic light didn't take so much space in this picture..

6/10

http://images4.bilddagboken.se/82/_u8/_u4/_u3/_u2/_u5/u843256/f/o/4b90446545c77689b7bae760c3ce03b45504f94cb8a4264b88feeb8e705ebb3b.jpg


I like the composition, but when shooting roses, you need to watch your exposure compensation, reds are very easy to clip and I can see alot of of it clipping.

7/10

Member
Posts: 36,992
Joined: Jan 6 2007
Gold: 7,821.00
Oct 24 2010 11:35am
Quote (Eek @ 24 Oct 2010 18:59)
I like the composition, but when shooting roses, you need to watch your exposure compensation, reds are very easy to clip and I can see alot of of it clipping.

7/10

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m223/Jdmhoodz/IMG_7515.jpg


Yeah now that you mention it.. ^_^
I just thought it gave some cool contrast, but I'd rather compensate for it at least a bit :P
Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Oct 24 2010 08:36pm
Quote (Eek @ Oct 24 2010 04:59pm)
I like the composition, but when shooting roses, you need to watch your exposure compensation, reds are very easy to clip and I can see alot of of it clipping.

7/10

http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m223/Jdmhoodz/IMG_7515.jpg


Some harsh shadows spotting up in various places, most significantly on the stem of the closer flower, and then leaves at the bottom of the frame.
You talk about exposure in your previous rating, however, there seems to be more "clipping" in yours than of the red rose. (Which I would only have suggested cropping the outer edges out, because the center detail & focus is spot on)
In your shot, the petals are a vibrant purple, however, there is some extreme overblown whites that appear on the petals the light's directly hitting, which then throws the balance off of the closer petals.
Also, the perspective could be improved, there are lines that lead into each other, and the foreground flower actually collides with the background "bokeh'd" out white (Overblown?) flower, as well as the stem of the main back flower.
The focus is alright, that can come down to personal preference, for me I would have liked a higher number, to get that front flower in focus, it's just a big purple blur that, in my opinion, is a huge bomb in this particular piece.

A little harsh, trying to be very constructive and provide reasoning behind each distracting, I'm going to rate it a 5/10, because subject and creative motivations are there, but it seems to be lacking some technical aspects, which I know you
are usually on top of Eek.
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
Oct 24 2010 08:45pm
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ Oct 24 2010 10:36pm)
Some harsh shadows spotting up in various places, most significantly on the stem of the closer flower, and then leaves at the bottom of the frame.
You talk about exposure in your previous rating, however, there seems to be more "clipping" in yours than of the red rose. (Which I would only have suggested cropping the outer edges out, because the center detail & focus is spot on)
In your shot, the petals are a vibrant purple, however, there is some extreme overblown whites that appear on the petals the light's directly hitting, which then throws the balance off of the closer petals.
Also, the perspective could be improved, there are lines that lead into each other, and the foreground flower actually collides with the background "bokeh'd" out white (Overblown?) flower, as well as the stem of the main back flower.
The focus is alright, that can come down to personal preference, for me I would have liked a higher number, to get that front flower in focus, it's just a big purple blur that, in my opinion, is a huge bomb in this particular piece.

A little harsh, trying to be very constructive and provide reasoning behind each distracting, I'm going to rate it a 5/10, because subject and creative motivations are there, but it seems to be lacking some technical aspects, which I know you
are usually on top of Eek.


Excellent critique!! Thank you so much for it. :) It is infact blown out a little, i didn't even notice that myself. Major facepalm :doh:

Next time i go out to that location and shoot, i'll definitely keep that in mind.

Again, thanks for the excellent critique. ;)
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev12829303132124Next
Closed New Topic New Poll