I have the mark II and have had the 70-200 f4L. The 70-200 simply blows the 50/1.8 out of the water in af speed and accuracy. In low light the nifty fifty just doesn't work at all when in af.

Now that I have the 135L, everything else just seems too darn on slow. >_<

the 50mm 1.8 II is awful in terms of af. mainly because of it´s accuracy.

Isn't the 50 1.8 II known for its shitty AF?

I should buy a nifty fifty instead of carrying around the 1.2 :\

that´s what we are talking about all the time

I still dont get how to get the whole car in focus from my position. it´s always the back that is sharp and the front is blurry.

Close down your aperture.

uhmmm ye that makes sense lol. why would it be different when doing panning than doing normal shots. I´ll try that. >.<


EDIT: I get pretty much the same results at F 11

This post was edited by RecoveryChannel on Oct 12 2010 08:32am

I shoot my previous shots at f/22

may I see em? I think I´d have to go up to ISO 800 in that case. at least