So I wouldnt like to see the usual photoshop work saved as jpg file.


this confuses me.

do you not want it as a jpeg file?
so raw?

or i dont understand >.<

and does it have to be roses?
theyre kind of expensive. >.<

i have a orchid


also is there more detail on how it should be besides a vase and roses?

define your meaning of outstanding.



This post was edited by mew on Feb 28 2010 01:47am

Some other nice flowers are nice too, I just dont know that many types of flowers, thats why I though of roses in the first place.
Youre work is really, really nice.. Im really happy to see them.

What I meant was not to edit it with photoshop, as I would like to have it printed as an actual picture, to put it into glass frame. Simply dont want to lost the quality of the picture.. I was told to write such a short information, to eliminate photoshop GFXers . Hope you know what I mean. Roses are really nice, but some other flowers are welcome as well.. as I said, I thought of those in the first place.
As for being outsanding.. Its just have to be catchy, gotta get my attention.. I know its hard to explain, but Im sure all of your photos got my attention is some way.. so you should worry about it .

No more details I think. The vase also isnt the requirement, I just though of it as it would look really simple. If you have any other idea, come up with it .

sounds like fun, ill try to brainstorm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk6kV5N1rzs

Both in sample sizes:

Photoshop doesn't degrade quality.. I've had a 30x20 of some of my photos printed and I've used photoshop on some of them, I see no difference between a photoshopped one and one straight from the camera in terms of quality.

The picture will be printed, so I need a special printing extension of the file with resolution good enough to be printed, not a gif file. Friend told me to add this information as he had some problems with his pictures.. simply, I wouldnt like to have that kind of problem.

photoshop is an image ENHANCING programme aswell. it´s used to get the best out of your photographs. there´s no point in requesting people not to use it. if you´d say I dont want you to use photoshop because I´m not a friend of image editing, but like my photos natural and straight from the camera, that would be something else.

I think you got this all wrong. If you take a picture with a dslr for example, and take it in raw format. Then you can improve the picture extremely much with zero quality loss.
Getting it large enough to print it at a size of 30x20 or so is no problem either. If you'll get a photo done by somebody who knows photography in this forum, you can be sure it's good enough to get it printed for the requested size

photoshop doesent reduce resolution, neither it does lower the image quality(unless you lower the iq on photoshop), but you can make the iq better on photoshop. if you want a raw file it has to be ran thru photoshop anyway.

can you explain whats a special printing extension of a file? you mean dpi set to printing dpi and color profile to printers profile? if so, they can set the dpi on the shop and we cant know the profile of the printer, they should send the profile from the shop as photoshop plugin. but that makes no real difference on the print what color profile we use since they can easily convert it to printers profile from sRGB..

I assume youre right. But I didnt want to risk if someone does it well or not, thats why I wrote so.. just in case to have to done 'right'. I wouldnt like to have a quality loss a pic which could be 30-45 or 45-45cms.

Still waiting on your works, as for now Marie is leading with first sample .

Edit
Antichrist-, you got the point. I thought it depends on you, the edition. Thats why I wanted to have it done by the camera. Thanks for clearing this for me.

This post was edited by Lentylek on Feb 28 2010 08:20am