photoshop. no i do understand what ur saying, though. i would have made around the tree neater if i had more time. if i replace a sky again ill do it!

I've done that before Used a photo that I took, to replace the sky, though.

I really like the sky you put in one of my pictures lol but I think not all pictures could be done that way and still look more or less natural especially those photos with a lot of trees and other "fuzzy" details lol. I am sure if you spend some time and energy in trying to blending the sky into the picture and change the color and exposure in the edges to match the sky it would probably look really great.

Pictures 2 and 4 are my favorite!
btw, how do you make the black border around your pictures?



I need it to be explained as if you were trying to explain it to your mother

Sent you a pm

This post was edited by MotherOfTwo on Mar 14 2009 01:19pm

glad you like them!

Explained Here

did a bit of editing on the building picture, tell me whatcha think!

Thats terrible... more like a photomanipulation than a picture then.

Btw, the second picture is my favourite, nice work! (if you didnt replace the tree )

This post was edited by SeaBas on Mar 14 2009 01:20pm

a lot of photographers do it, i just did it quickly and it looks scrappy.

no the second was not edited

I think instead of heavy editing of that photo you probably should go back there during a nice sunset and take some pictures

Not saying how you did it was terrible, just replacing certain parts of a picture is no longer photography i think. That other photographers do it doesnt make it okay for me, If you think this way you could just stay at home and create the perfect picture by copying from other ones. That some pictures are not good because of the weather makes photography more fun for me, because it is a challenge to find an opportunity to take a picture under the right circumstances.