Quote (Tomes @ Thu, Feb 26 2009, 08:26pm)
lol what? i wasnt talking about making areas lighter with burning

. I asked if you want to show how you would use burning to make it look better, since you told it would get little better(you can prove this by simply burning it to look bit better). Its not about the photo, its about proving that you got no idea about the burning, as you had no idea about making foreground whiter. I find it rather stupid that you tell people what they should do, even tho you cant do it yourself either.
I get the point why you dont like it, but for me the beutifull sky is enough for the photo not being a piece of crap(i dont think this is near my best, but i find it ok), if the foreground was better naturally the pic would be better allso, like if everything else would be perfect on it. You talk and talk whats wrong with this pic(and meny other pics on the forum allso), but i havent seen eny pic from you that doesent fail on same things as you think other peoples photos fail..
If you personally like the way it looks why the fuck are you getting upset when I'm telling you I don't like it? My first post in this thread said I didn't care for the composition, anything I posted since were possible suggestions that
might make it better, there's absolutely no cure for a badly composited photograph, and unfortunately, I think this photograph is badly composited.
You like the sky,
great, but when you're posting stuff online, be ready for some criticism, and don't get offended by it, not everyone is going to like the same things you are.
If you'd like to suggest some things I could change in my photographs then go ahead, I'd be happy to accept some criticism.
Quote (doyleo @ Thu, Feb 26 2009, 08:29pm)
i thought dodge makes sections lighter and burn darker (basically)
That's exactly what dodging and burning in does.
This post was edited by Veilside on Feb 26 2009 01:43pm