Hi Out There - Topic

Member

Posts: 3,248

Joined: Mar 21 2008

Gold: 2,721.01

Dec 29 2008 04:24pm

Quote (Veilside @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:18pm)

Sure, you might think that, but when it comes to printing a large format print, you can see slight camera shake, nothing you'd notice when looking at your screen.

I don't see where you're getting confused with what I've said.

im not getting confused... but nvm!!

Nah still disagree as long as the subject is still, and there is no wind, i think it would be possible to produce a printable print (lol) at 1/10 with IS lens.

Veilside

Member

Posts: 21,066

Joined: Dec 16 2005

Gold: 100.07

#22

Dec 29 2008 04:25pm

Quote (Futurama @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:23pm)

some comparison graphs from Dpreview:

IS on
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_17-85_4-5p6_is_usm_c16/Samples/is/wide_is_on.gif

IS off
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_17-85_4-5p6_is_usm_c16/Samples/is/wide_is_off.gif

What sensor are those graphs for?

Quote (doyleo @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:24pm)

im not getting confused... but nvm!!

Nah still disagree as long as the subject is still, and there is no wind, i think it would be possible to produce a printable print (lol) at 1/10 with IS lens.

Depends if you're shooting on film or digital, what ISO/ASA you're shooting at, what the size of the digital sensor/film is and what size you're printing at.

This post was edited by Veilside on Dec 29 2008 04:26pm

Futurama

Member

Posts: 11,814

Joined: Feb 4 2006

Gold: 8.09

#23

Dec 29 2008 04:28pm

Quote (Veilside @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 04:25pm)

What sensor are those graphs for?

hmm it doesn't say which camera was used but I found it in a review of Canon EF-s 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS USM lens and my guess is that they used a EOS 40D

Veilside

Member

Posts: 21,066

Joined: Dec 16 2005

Gold: 100.07

#24

Dec 29 2008 04:29pm

Quote (Futurama @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:28pm)

hmm it doesn't say which camera was used but I found it in a review of Canon EF-s 17-85 f/4-5.6 IS USM lens and my guess is that they used a EOS 40D

Well then it's only applicable for that sensor and lens setup. Yes?

doyleo

Member

Posts: 3,248

Joined: Mar 21 2008

Gold: 2,721.01

#25

Dec 29 2008 04:43pm

Quote (Veilside @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:29pm)

Well then it's only applicable for that sensor and lens setup. Yes?

yes, but it will differ from camera to camera of course!

Quote (Futurama @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 10:59pm)

with IS turned on I have taken some sharp images with shutter speed as slow as 1/10 second

He is a 40D user, and he can produce sharp shots with a shutter speed of 1/10 sec with IS on

Veilside

Member

Posts: 21,066

Joined: Dec 16 2005

Gold: 100.07

#26

Dec 29 2008 04:47pm

Quote (doyleo @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:43pm)

yes, but it will differ from camera to camera of course!

Of course, but having studied photography, I was always told that anything over 1/60th needed a tripod. Granted we used 35mm film a lot more than digital.

doyleo

Member

Posts: 3,248

Joined: Mar 21 2008

Gold: 2,721.01

#27

Dec 29 2008 05:14pm

Quote (Veilside @ Mon, Dec 29 2008, 11:47pm)

Of course, but having studied photography, I was always told that anything over 1/60th needed a tripod. Granted we used 35mm film a lot more than digital.

do you not mean under 1/60 ^^

Coz i dont use a tripod at 1/500

Futurama

Member

Posts: 11,814

Joined: Feb 4 2006

Gold: 8.09

#28

Dec 29 2008 06:14pm

Whatever

I was just telling you what I have done and could do with my dslr and I don't think it would have been any different if I used another camera, lets say Rebel XTI, except I probably wouldn't use a higher ISO number than 800. With the same lens the images taken would most probably have been equally sharp at 1/10 sec, f/4 and with IS turned on.

This post was edited by Futurama on Dec 29 2008 06:16pm

Antichrist-

Member

Posts: 29,057

Joined: Aug 3 2005

Gold: 13.37

#29

Dec 29 2008 09:59pm

100%crop