i dabble with a couple 35mm rangefinders, it's all good fun.

pretty expensive for a 35mm

i use a canon ae-1

do you self develop?

poop 1/30 lowest shutter speed.

i might get a canon wp-1
they say it can go 6 meters underwater.

and im also thinking about getting a hasselblad 500c/m or mamiya rz67.

i was confused as why you responded with a underwater camera, then it dawned on me

dabble
v.tr.
To splash or spatter with or as if with a liquid: "The moon hung over the harbor dabbling the waves with gold" (Katherine Mansfield).
v.intr.
1. To splash liquid gently and playfully.
2. To undertake something superficially or without serious intent: "The restaurant business entails more than . . . dabbling in interior design" (Andy Birsh).
3. To bob forward and under in shallow water so as to feed off the bottom.

lol i meant definition #2, just an amateur that still struggles to develop and scan film. especially the scanning part.

If it's the first time shooting MF I'd start with Bronica, but if you have some extra cash to burn a Mamiya rz for sure.

The blads are just so damn expensive..

I've shot with 501cm hasselblad , 4x5 and 8x10

haha go the blad then if you have the cash

I use to have a linhof master technika, that was awesome, so impractical but the quality was first rate.

I have quite a few cameras and I don't really care to list all of them, but the ones I mainly shoot with are my Minolta X-370 for 35mm, Mamiya RB67 for 6x7cm, and a Crown Graphic for 4x5in. I wish I had a true technical camera like Lithfkn's old one. My large format camera only has 1 movable standard so it's not as good.