Quote (onepagememory @ Jun 24 2011 05:41pm)
vr is only for stationary. It makes me laugh at those who argued for a 24-105 F4 > 24-70 2.8 because it has IS rofl.
Quote (Someoneiforgetwho @ Jun 24 2011 05:41pm)
I wouldn't use VR in that shooting scenario. VR would semi negate the whole shooting at slower shutter speeds to achieve motion blur. VR is more for shooting something that is stationary.
^this
makes total sense. thank you

And i will take a larger aperture any day over IS
This post was edited by Hanley on Jun 24 2011 12:25pm