Quote (Verdena @ 13 Feb 2011 16:47)

I'm sorry, looks like i wasn't here the day you were declared the king of photography.

Quote (Antichrist- @ Feb 13 2011 02:56pm)

nn to be king or even know much to see that this kind of sky doesent look good:

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/4822/54401039540367ed46aez.jpg

Quote (Verdena @ 13 Feb 2011 16:56)

oh wait.
get good at post production.

http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/8566/editwq.jpg

Quote (Antichrist- @ Feb 13 2011 03:00pm)

lol at u if you think urs looks good, like i said you cant get the sky look good by recovering the sky. and what you did to it isnt recovering anyways

Quote (Verdena @ 13 Feb 2011 17:01)

I never said the sky had to be recovered i said it was overexposed and that could have looked better with post production.
Do you think the original is better than my edit?
Don't lie to yourself.

Quote (Antichrist- @ Feb 13 2011 03:03pm)

its not better, neither it is worse.

anyways stop acting big, a good camera doesent make you any better

Quote (Verdena @ 13 Feb 2011 17:05)

God, you're so predictable.

Quote (Antichrist- @ Feb 13 2011 03:06pm)

so you have heard that being said before and still dont understand it?

Quote (Antichrist- @ Feb 13 2011 02:46pm)

you can see blue sky slightly on it still, and you can see that its all noisy and some gray stuff around the clouds and clouds lack details and are just some bits of random gray noise here and there on white. it would look absolutely horrible if you pumped up the sky. dont argue about things you clearly got no idea about