Quote (Verdena @ Feb 3 2011 09:31am)
I went to my trusted retailer and he told me to consider the 70-200 2.8 non is instead of the 70-200 4 is, what do you guys say?
I just sold my remaining stuff today, and i ordered the mk ii, i gotta choose the lens between 2.8 non is or 4 is.
No. The F4 L IS has much better optics than the 2.8 non-is. Plus you have IS (although it won't do much if there is movement). With the advent of low-noise, high-iso sensors, aperture is becoming an aesthetic look instead of a neccesity. sharpness is becoming king, and the F4 IS is Canon's second sharpest zoomie, second only to the already-legendary 2.8 II. I'd still go with the 135.