d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Lens Purchase 2011
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Jan 4 2011 08:19am
Quote (CitizenScuba @ 4 Jan 2011 08:11)
inb4Omar.

Canon Nikon mount adapter. Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. Can't go wrong.


And to be serious. Of course 50mm primes are worth it. Primes > Zooms, any day.


actually you will go wrong with that. 14-24 doesent have aperature ring in it, so you can only shoot it wide open, unless you have a nikon body that you use for stopping it down. also it would only work with manual focus. not to mention that we dont know if he is looking for ultra wide angle..

sigma 50mm 1.4 is superior to canon version in some aspects, but canon is superior to it in some aspects. canons 1.8 has the best value for money, but if you want to pay extra for 1.4, you will get extra

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Jan 4 2011 08:21am
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Jan 4 2011 08:28am
I own the Sigma 10-20mm wide angle lens, and I can tell you I love it for what I need it for. Canon's is of course better, but the price tag is much higher.

Getting Sigma lenses, though, sometimes they aren't as sharp and need to be sent in to be calibrated. If you get a good one, awesome :thumbsup: I went with the Sigma only because of the price on it compared to the Canon... perhaps there's a better choice with wide angles these days. Good luck with your choice, I'm sure you'll have fun with it.

This post was edited by Chantal7 on Jan 4 2011 08:28am
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Jan 4 2011 12:47pm
Quote (Chantal7 @ Jan 4 2011 07:28am)
I own the Sigma 10-20mm wide angle lens, and I can tell you I love it for what I need it for. Canon's is of course better, but the price tag is much higher.

Getting Sigma lenses, though, sometimes they aren't as sharp and need to be sent in to be calibrated. If you get a good one, awesome :thumbsup: I went with the Sigma only because of the price on it compared to the Canon... perhaps there's a better choice with wide angles these days. Good luck with your choice, I'm sure you'll have fun with it.


Nikon is better in wide angles, for now. Of course, Nikon can never come close to Canon's telephotos.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Jan 4 2011 06:45pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Jan 4 2011 12:47pm)
Nikon is better in wide angles, for now. Of course, Nikon can never come close to Canon's telephotos.


Dayum! Kind of wish I knew that back when I bought mine, haha. They're probably worth a lot more ?
Member
Posts: 3,373
Joined: Dec 2 2006
Gold: 0.56
Jan 4 2011 07:39pm
Quote (Chantal7 @ Jan 4 2011 07:45pm)
Dayum! Kind of wish I knew that back when I bought mine, haha. They're probably worth a lot more ?


You bought a wide angle? Or are you talking about the 24-70?
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Jan 4 2011 08:03pm
Quote (kratos @ Jan 4 2011 07:39pm)
You bought a wide angle? Or are you talking about the 24-70?


I bought a wide angle. I got it a few years ago actually. I would still love to get the 24-70 . :cry:

This post was edited by Chantal7 on Jan 4 2011 08:03pm
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Jan 4 2011 09:03pm
Quote (Chantal7 @ Jan 4 2011 07:03pm)
I bought a wide angle. I got it a few years ago actually. I would still love to get the 24-70 . :cry:


I will be selling mine as soon as I get the 35L.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Jan 4 2011 09:34pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Jan 4 2011 09:03pm)
I will be selling mine as soon as I get the 35L.


How much for? Only curious. I don't have a penny saved up at all for a lens like that.
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
Jan 4 2011 10:17pm
Quote (Chantal7 @ Jan 4 2011 08:34pm)
How much for? Only curious. I don't have a penny saved up at all for a lens like that.

1k+ shipping if direct, or 1k+ shipping + fees if through amazon or paypal. It's a guaranteed sharp version (one of the sharpest i've seen), so if I wanted to I could even sell it even higher than new to the right buyer :D
A photographer I know had to return his lens 7 times before he got a sharp version :\
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Jan 4 2011 10:33pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Jan 4 2011 10:17pm)
1k+ shipping if direct, or 1k+ shipping + fees if through amazon or paypal. It's a guaranteed sharp version (one of the sharpest i've seen), so if I wanted to I could even sell it even higher than new to the right buyer :D
A photographer I know had to return his lens 7 times before he got a sharp version :\


Whatever is cheaper would be the easiest for me, if I purchased it from you. Such a pain ... spend so much on a lens and don't get a decent one? Stupid. Do you at least get it calibrated for free?

This post was edited by Chantal7 on Jan 4 2011 10:33pm
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll