Quote (hestJaevel @ 6 Jan 2011 16:30)

Well I've tried it for 6 weeks now, and I'm happy with the iso performance

http://images4.bilddagboken.se/47/_u8/_u4/_u3/_u2/_u5/u843256/f/o/8cda1671f1c7db6b98bcc3595824e2eae7153d1454a3d694527d892c1a914566.jpg

That image was shot at iso 3200, no noise reduction has been done.. I'm able to shoot with lenses I'd never think about using when the light is a bit from perfect.
But to be honest, I'd concider getting a d300 instead, as the iso performance is just a part of what a good camera should have. The bigger grip and the bigger buffer would
be great advantages over d7000!

I really dislike the buffer with raw (13 images iirc), and the fact that jpeg high only can buffer up 15 images doesn't help at all..

Except from that, I'm a happy camera owner

Quote (jayandnix @ 6 Jan 2011 15:11)

thanks
i will get a D700 as well
would love the D3s and D3x, but i am being realistic and getting D700 and D7000

Quote (Antichrist- @ 6 Jan 2011 15:15)

damn thats nice from an entry level camera. but you dont get much noise with well lit scene and with short shutterspeed. got some examples in low light, with about 1/60-1/100th shutterspeed?

Quote (hestJaevel @ 6 Jan 2011 17:24)

yeah, d3s would be awesome to have, but it's far from realistic for me as well



sure thing, here comes iso 6400, f/2.5, 1/60 shutter speed.
Done from a raw file, 25% luminance noise reduction added.
Resampled to 2048 height

http://images4.bilddagboken.se/50/u8/u4/u3/u2/u5/u843256/f/o/329ed97d3997821924017c3f0c6a99d021f130f83c392f34d37eeefb96ee7f8f.jpg

Quote (Antichrist- @ 6 Jan 2011 15:33)

it does seem to lose bit details compared to pro models, but still looks really good.