d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Lightning! > Feedback Appreciated
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 62,873
Joined: Aug 2 2009
Gold: 1,189.90
Oct 20 2010 10:31pm
Quote (Futurama @ Oct 20 2010 04:54pm)
You probably need to use the self-timer function when shooting with long exposures otherwise you would get blurred pictures due the fact that the camera shakes when you press the shutter button
and a sturdy tripod also helps. Does your camera have long exposure noise reduction? If not you can shoot RAW and try to reduce the noise in post-processing.




wow good shot!
Have you tried to adjust the overexposed parts in Photoshop?


I shoot in raw, used 2sec self timer, and have a sturdy tripod... Still crap =/
I actually pride myself is PS work, and I couldn't reduce as much noise as I'd like.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Oct 20 2010 11:09pm
Quote (AnimeFTW @ Oct 20 2010 10:31pm)
I shoot in raw, used 2sec self timer, and have a sturdy tripod... Still crap =/
I actually pride myself is PS work, and I couldn't reduce as much noise as I'd like.


Hmm... maybe the problem is with the camera and it's sensor not making good quality shots at night :\

Even my camera can produce a lot of noise and nonsense.

Also, getting the focus right is probably the most difficult for me. I usually manual focus



Can't wait to take more lightning photos next year.... ugh.... too many months to wait!

This post was edited by Chantal7 on Oct 20 2010 11:10pm
Member
Posts: 7,583
Joined: Nov 12 2008
Gold: 2,252.12
Oct 20 2010 11:17pm
Awsome pics. <3
Member
Posts: 11,567
Joined: Sep 11 2008
Gold: 205.00
Oct 21 2010 12:54am
Quote (Chantal7 @ 21 Oct 2010 09:09)
Hmm... maybe the problem is with the camera and it's sensor not making good quality shots at night :\

Even my camera can produce a lot of noise and nonsense.

Also, getting the focus right is probably the most difficult for me. I usually manual focus

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4030/4638194776_da31ace0e5_b.jpg

Can't wait to take more lightning photos next year.... ugh.... too many months to wait!


that is brilliant
Member
Posts: 62,873
Joined: Aug 2 2009
Gold: 1,189.90
Oct 21 2010 01:14am
Quote (Chantal7 @ Oct 20 2010 10:09pm)
Hmm... maybe the problem is with the camera and it's sensor not making good quality shots at night :\

Even my camera can produce a lot of noise and nonsense.

Also, getting the focus right is probably the most difficult for me. I usually manual focus

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4030/4638194776_da31ace0e5_b.jpg

Can't wait to take more lightning photos next year.... ugh.... too many months to wait!


Yeah, I was assuming it's the sensor. It's like a $5-600 camera I think, so it's not the best camera around. But I'm new at photography so I didn't want to get something super expensive at the start.
I want to learn the differences between lenses, sensors and such before I upgrade =]

That's a badass shot though, it looks like that's a tornado!
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Oct 21 2010 01:18am
Sony isn't known for good high ISO performance :(
If you want a decent one you need to look at either a Nikon D90 or Rebel T2i.
Member
Posts: 62,873
Joined: Aug 2 2009
Gold: 1,189.90
Oct 21 2010 01:41am
Quote (Futurama @ Oct 21 2010 12:18am)
Sony isn't known for good high ISO performance :(
If you want a decent one you need to look at either a Nikon D90 or Rebel T2i.


Well hopefully if I get a new camera it will be an upgrade and not just a cross-budget model =P
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Oct 21 2010 01:55am
Quote (AnimeFTW @ Oct 21 2010 01:41am)
Well hopefully if I get a new camera it will be an upgrade and not just a cross-budget model =P


hmm well I kinda forgot to say that noise also appears when you underexpose an image. That's usually the cause of noise in the first place. So that in combination with a Sony probably the cause.
Have you taken any other long exposure pictures?

Here is a picture I took with a 30s exposure and ISO 400. The noise in the sky part is apparent but can be reduced when processing the RAW file.


This post was edited by Futurama on Oct 21 2010 01:55am
Member
Posts: 62,873
Joined: Aug 2 2009
Gold: 1,189.90
Oct 21 2010 02:01am
Quote (Futurama @ Oct 21 2010 12:55am)
hmm well I kinda forgot to say that noise also appears when you underexpose an image. That's usually the cause of noise in the first place. So that in combination with a Sony probably the cause.
Have you taken any other long exposure pictures?

Here is a picture I took with a 30s exposure and ISO 400. The noise in the sky part is apparent but can be reduced when processing the RAW file.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4089/5035100467_25fd0e5039_b.jpg


Hmm, I didn't know underexposing an image could lead to noise... I'll definitely take note of that. That was probably the problem in the first place

I haven't really taken to many long exposure pics besides the lightning one
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Oct 21 2010 08:44am
Quote (AnimeFTW @ Oct 21 2010 01:14am)
Yeah, I was assuming it's the sensor. It's like a $5-600 camera I think, so it's not the best camera around. But I'm new at photography so I didn't want to get something super expensive at the start.
I want to learn the differences between lenses, sensors and such before I upgrade =]

That's a badass shot though, it looks like that's a tornado!


That's perfect, glad you spent a little amount of money on figuring that stuff out. Like me, I probably would have chose a camera that had a little bit of a better sensor on it.

Doesn't have to be the best camera, but you learned from getting that camera and I can see you upgrading in the near future.

Lol - not a tornado.... if it was, I wasn't sure what I would do.... Here's another one that looks like a tornado too haha:

Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll