Quote (Eek @ Aug 12 2010 12:29am)
I would get the d90 and spend the rest in glass. I doubt the d300s pixel quality is dramatically better since it's a crop sensor also (correct me if i'm wrong.. i'm not a nikon guy).
Unless you shoot sports where you need the high burst rate.. i would take better glass instead.
The AF is better, probably better ISO performance and the build maybe better in the 300s. If that's worth the cost to you, then by all means go for it.
/2 cents.
The d300s has four times the d90's sensitivity when shooting in raw.
The sensor is the same, but the converter is different.
This post was edited by Verdena on Aug 11 2010 05:56pm