d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > I Got Some Extra Funds > Cannon L Series Prime Lenses Inquiry
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 531Replies: 15Track Topic
Member
Posts: 29,844
Joined: Feb 12 2006
Gold: 121,771.00
#11
Apr 11 2010 05:18pm
Quote (onepagememory @ 11 Apr 2010 23:34)
True. But fisheyes are so limited in use that they're hardly worth considering. I'm looking to have fun and make money at the same time.


its only as limited as your imagination and creativity. :P

This post was edited by mew on Apr 11 2010 05:19pm
Member
Posts: 2,805
Joined: Apr 29 2007
Gold: 240.00
#12
Apr 11 2010 08:00pm
Portrait + architecture with an fisheye are amazing!
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
#13
Apr 12 2010 08:48am
Quote (dab @ Apr 11 2010 07:00pm)
Portrait + architecture with an fisheye are amazing!


Yes they are but unfortunately the commercial demand for such is limited. As our generation takes over the industry, I'm sure we'll see more fish eye advertisement.
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
#14
Apr 12 2010 08:49am
I shot a wedding yesterday and I was careless and my diffuser broke/tore. Iso hawt diffuser suggestions too.

This post was edited by onepagememory on Apr 12 2010 08:49am
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
#15
Apr 12 2010 04:42pm
Quote (onepagememory @ Apr 11 2010 11:34am)
Inclining towards a 60mm, but give me some idea on some sharp, fun lenses to use. Already have a 70-200 4.0 IS L, 24-70 2.8 IS L, and a 100 mm 2.8 L macro in the L series. Inclining towards 1.2's. Roughly 4 grand to invest.


uh... first of all there is no 60mm L prime and second the 24-70 f2.8L IS is just a rumor so it doesn't exist yet unless you are an engineer working for Canon.
If you really are a professional wedding photographer I have heard that both 35L and 135L are great for what you shoot and you may need to upgrade your 70-200 f4 to the f2.8 IS version

This post was edited by Futurama on Apr 12 2010 04:42pm
Member
Posts: 18,010
Joined: Apr 8 2008
Gold: 8,653.74
#16
Apr 12 2010 07:30pm
Quote (Futurama @ Apr 12 2010 03:42pm)
uh... first of all there is no 60mm L prime and second the 24-70 f2.8L IS is just a rumor so it doesn't exist yet unless you are an engineer working for Canon.
If you really are a professional wedding photographer I have heard that both 35L and 135L are great for what you shoot and you may need to upgrade your 70-200 f4 to the f2.8 IS version


Sorry i made two tipos: 50 mm L prime and 24-60 2.8 L non IS because the 70-200 4.0 is IS.

The 70-200 2.8 is already on my shopping list. I only got the 4.0 out of courtesy for a female photographer that I work with (family) because she's not very strong.

I'm interested in the 35L.
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact