Quote (mew @ 16 Dec 2009 00:10)
maybe ill find a bug collector!

gross. >.<
the tamron 300mm is a 1:2 macro lens.
so should i get the
70mm or 105mm?
or go for canon?
the 70mm is more expensive than the 105mm
and what is this?!
Number of Diaphragm Blades ?
this tamron?
http://www.tamron.com/lenses/prod/70300_di_a017.aspits not real macro lens even tho it says macro, same on meny sigma zooms. real macro is coinsidered 1:1 on full frame
i doubt that there is eny difference on iq between the 70mm and 105mm, or maybe wide open but no one macros wide open, you need f/16+. you do know that macroing needs quite alot of light? imo the 70mm isnt long enough for macroing, but that depends on what you shoot at, for bugs get the 105mm imo.
Number of diaphragm blades means the number of those blades that sets the aperature. basicly more blades = rounder bokeh balls = softer bokeh, but the 105mm has awesome bokeh and one blade less doesent really make eny difference
forgot to mention that sigma 105 gets longer when focusing and canon 100mm(non L) doesent, if that makes difference and you dont care about canon costing bit more, you could go with the canon. but canon is bigger, with lens hood its the same length as the sigma with lens hood and focused at its longest(dunno if the lens is long when focusing close or at infinity)
f/45 on the 105mm is really nice, but it allso needs hella lot of light.
leave food on the tables and dont clean the house and if your lucky you might be able to get some flys there