raw has nothing to do with it and it can look realistic if you do it right

Well, cloning would obviously be done with the section above, where rocks are visible under the water...
and because of the way the water flows, it would look clearly off with rocks in a place they normally wouldn't be seen in the stream.
and then taking any selection off from anything too far from the rock would be off in the highlights of expose??

use your imagination on how it might look under the water and how the stream could go. this can be edited away so that people wont notice that there could have been a rock. im not saying its easy to edit that rock away and get it look realistic, but it can be done and im sure that you could do it if you try enough.

Pretty spectacular

Try perspective cropping...

Whats that thing in the bottom right?



oh i agree that's pretty pathetic that second link in your sig.

This post was edited by doyleo on Nov 10 2009 01:04pm

Thank you!
That's my friends jacket actually, she was holding it there cause the winds were hitting around 80kmh gusts up in the mountains because it's in the middle of a valley, and
I was looking through the eye piece and the wind was actually blowing so hard there were tears actually getting blown from my eye and landing on my jacket.
So she just held it there for keep the wind from blowing into my eye lol! I should have cropped it, I didn't notice until later!

I think you did a really good job on this picture.

What was the shutter speed?

Thanks

It's 3 photos, and each one was shot at F22 , at an Exposure of /8

Off the top of your head do you remember what lens you were using?

I love shooting with some of my wider angle lenses.

wow its beautiful

I really like it. Looks good.