d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Great Horned Owl.
Prev12
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Oct 31 2009 03:38pm
Quote (Antichrist- @ Oct 31 2009 09:36pm)
weird, on my camera and my old cameras(if i remember right) normal pic mode was 3 sharpening, not 0


Well I just checked mine and it's 0,0,0.
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Oct 31 2009 03:43pm
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ 1 Nov 2009 00:38)
Well I just checked mine and it's 0,0,0.


really weird, pic looks like atleast 3 sharpening and really sharp lens. i checked and all eos cameras have 3 sharpening at normal mode, but maybe you edited it, dunno. Enyway the outcome looks too sharp, might be because of the lens allso if your 100% sure its not on camera sharpening. in the end the resault is same, too much sharpness that should be corrected
Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Oct 31 2009 03:53pm
Quote (Antichrist- @ Oct 31 2009 09:43pm)
really weird, pic looks like atleast 3 sharpening and really sharp lens. i checked and all eos cameras have 3 sharpening at normal mode, but maybe you edited it, dunno. Enyway the outcome looks too sharp, might be because of the lens allso if your 100% sure its not on camera sharpening. in the end the resault is same, too much sharpness that should be corrected


Maybe your monitor is not calibrated..You say all my shots are "too sharp" none of the 40+ viewers in the last hour on Flickr have mentioned it being "too sharp."
I just won a Spyder 3 from photo expo last weekend, it's not sharp to me.
70-200 L Lens.

Also explain how I'm going to correct sharpness??
By fuckin blurring it in photoshop??
That's the opposite of what every wildlife photographer I've talked to has ever told me...

This post was edited by TheBlackRose66 on Oct 31 2009 03:54pm
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Oct 31 2009 04:25pm
my monitor is calibrated and calibration has nothing to do with sharpness. i have heard that meny people have needed to blur theyr photos(in original size ofc) when using some l-lenses because they are too sharp, i had to do this few times allso with my old 50mm 1.2 when using big f-number and flash.

some programs make pics look too sharp when resizing, but this shouldnt happen with photoshop, unless there is some setting that you have changed.

has someone told you that you should not soften image if its too sharp, or what you mean by opposite of what i say?

This is what i mean with too sharp pic
Quote
In unnaturally sharp photos, you will find abrupt and too sharp edges. A correct sharp image shows all the details in an image. Unnaturally sharp photos lack the details in the photograph. They show too much contrast and also show digital noise. You may also find blockiness in such photographs. This makes the photograph look like artificial and different from the original.


people in flickr tend to be afraid to give bad input on good pics, if your not asking for it and theyr better than you and want to help you

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Oct 31 2009 04:26pm
Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Oct 31 2009 04:34pm
Quote (Antichrist- @ Oct 31 2009 10:25pm)
my monitor is calibrated and calibration has nothing to do with sharpness. i have heard that meny people have needed to blur theyr photos(in original size ofc) when using some l-lenses because they are too sharp, i had to do this few times allso with my old 50mm 1.2 when using big f-number and flash.

some programs make pics look too sharp when resizing, but this shouldnt happen with photoshop, unless there is some setting that you have changed.

has someone told you that you should not soften image if its too sharp, or what you mean by opposite of what i say?

This is what i mean with too sharp pic


people in flickr tend to be afraid to give bad input on good pics, if your not asking for it and theyr better than you and want to help you


I personally don't think you should be giving this kind of critique when you have never shot wildlife, especially when you're shooting pictures of the shadow of your drug paraphernalia...
I don't see any sharp edges, and I disagree completely with you about Flickr.
Again I don't think you can say something like that about Flickr when you don't even have a Pro account (Maybe buy one and see instead of wasting it on drugs to give you somewhat of a pleasure in your life?)

This post was edited by TheBlackRose66 on Oct 31 2009 04:35pm
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Oct 31 2009 04:43pm
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ 1 Nov 2009 01:34)
I personally don't think you should be giving this kind of critique when you have never shot wildlife, especially when you're shooting pictures of the shadow of your drug paraphernalia...
I don't see any sharp edges, and I disagree completely with you about Flickr.
Again I don't think you can say something like that about Flickr when you don't even have a Pro account (Maybe buy one and see instead of wasting it on drugs to give you somewhat of a pleasure in your life?)


U once told that you want constructive critism, this is it. Dont ask for it if you cant handle it. And this has nothing to do with wildlife or what i do when im stoned, its about the technical side of photography. Np i can stop helping you if you want. I see lack of details because too much sharpening on this and about all of the pics you posted here lately.

What comes to pro account, i dont care about paying for getting my pics in more groups to get more comments.

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Oct 31 2009 04:44pm
Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Oct 31 2009 04:48pm
Quote (Antichrist- @ Oct 31 2009 10:43pm)
U once told that you want constructive critism, this is it. Dont ask for it if you cant handle it. And this has nothing to do with wildlife or what i do when im stoned, its about the technical side of photography. Np i can stop helping you if you want. I see lack of details because too much sharpening on this and about all of the pics you posted here lately.

What comes to pro account, i dont care about paying for getting my pics in more groups to get more comments.


Your critique isn't constructive, it's the same bullshit for every one of my photos. I can handle it, but when it's bullshit like "It's too sharp." Then I get defensive, because I don't find it too sharp, none of my 12,668 views on Flickr don't find it too sharp, so I don't see how
you, who takes random photos with really no background of your drug habits to be in a place to make a remark like that. (Especially twice in a row.)
If you want, I can go through all of your photos and take them all down too for being too sharp/blurry as well.
You seem to be pulling shit from your ass...
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Oct 31 2009 05:07pm
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ 1 Nov 2009 01:48)
Your critique isn't constructive, it's the same bullshit for every one of my photos. I can handle it, but when it's bullshit like "It's too sharp." Then I get defensive, because I don't find it too sharp, none of my 12,668 views on Flickr don't find it too sharp, so I don't see how
you, who takes random photos with really no background of your drug habits to be in a place to make a remark like that. (Especially twice in a row.)
If you want, I can go through all of your photos and take them all down too for being too sharp/blurry as well.
You seem to be pulling shit from your ass...


it is constructive critism thats aimed to help you, you cant handle it so you take it as attack and attacking back is usually the best defence. Id be happy to get some constructive critism from you, but nn you attacking me cuz angry. so what if i like to take random photos? photos like that stoned shadow arent the only thing i shoot at, i know it and you know it, your just using this kind of stupid arguments because of the first sentence on this post

you didnt ansver my question on that topic of mine, please do and ill tell you something after. and there is no background because hard to get a background to pic of flat ground..

btw you got some hd screen on your computer? this could explain the oversharpness that you cant see with it

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Oct 31 2009 05:11pm
Go Back To Photography Topic List
Prev12
Closed New Topic New Poll