Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ Fri, Sep 4 2009, 07:46am)
Views: 20 Replies: 0
That's pathetic.
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ Fri, Sep 4 2009, 03:59pm)
Trees are impossible to move.
You posts make it sound like you would be able to do it so easily.
Each is over 60 pounds, some over 100. (They are trees, standing 10 feet tall)
Some are still in the ground, some are growing deformed, and some have snapped over and are covering the very fast rushing water.
Might I add this water is VERY cold as it runs directly from a glaciers.
Also, it was about a 70degree vertical climb up rocks to get above the falls.
Above the falls is not an actual viewing place, it's 100% nature, untouched by anybody, or anything.
I'm also quite against changing the way things were in a nature shot.
It's called Nature for a reason, Hence the natural part.
It's titled "perspective" for a reason, to give you the view of the perspective I viewed the falls from, what I went through to get my shots.
If you see the rocky ledge in about the center of the frame, I actually walked across that to get an upcoming shot.
Bob-o, for someone practically begging for replies you don't take the criticism very well. Your getting pretty defensive. I say take it with a grain of salt and move on. I'm not saying being headstrong doesn't have its good points just remember that these are just opinions.
In mine. If you need to tell us what your trying to accomplish for us to appreciate the shot. You haven't achieved what you were going for. Having found a way to do something as little as cutting out that large broken branch on the left could have made a difference. it is all a bit distracting. It creates too many lines. Its fine for just documenting where you were but as an artistic photo I think It could use a little work.
(I don't mean literally cutting)
Keep it up I like your shots on a whole.