Quote (doyleo @ Sun, May 10 2009, 03:01pm)
sure the quality and optics will be the same but i dont think it will focus as well, it is rear focusing but i dont think it has a USM or wave motor.
Im the same as you, Tomes, i just throw 450D and 85mil in the bag and that's it.
it was pretty easy to make a decision on a first camera, but for a second camera its amazingly hard. The 500D is so tempting with full HD recording, the 40D is tempting with its cheapness and the D300 is tempting coz it has some ridiculously high number of focus points and a great build quality.
I've you've got one system you're better off sticking with that system. So if you've already got Canon lenses just stick with Canon.
Quote (Tomes @ Sun, May 10 2009, 03:53pm)
you could get 1d mkII used cheaper than nikon d300

. Allso 5d used would be much cheaper than d300, d300 has better iso handling but with high iso d300 gets soft, so with 5d you could remove noise much better and maybe get even better high iso results. Not to mention that 5d is full frame and d300 is 1.5 crop..
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/iso-comparisons/2007-11/index.htmpersonally i think buying good cameras new is just a waste of money, or waste of a good camera, since u get crappier camera for same price if u buy it new..
Thought it might be worth mentioning that you need to be a bit wary of that site, the guy's got a clear bias.