Quote (Futurama @ Wed, Feb 25 2009, 09:46pm)
Your plan sounds a bit confusing probably because I am still having this stupid flu and still feeling dizzy lol. So why the hell did you spend so much money on a f/1.2 when you could buy like a 50 f/1.4 and a billion rolls of films for that money (exaggerating) lol. If I were you I would probably get the EF 16-35 2.8L lens it's just so "gosu" for landscape and low light photography but you are more into portraits which the 50mm is probably better for that purpose.
I dont like much wider than 24mm, i had the 10-20mm on my 400/40d and i got so bored with so wide angle, i thought the 24mm would be too wide, but now that im using it i think its just the right widest angle for me. Maybe im sounding confusing because really high

, dunno. Enyway i forgot to say that i made little tuning for my film camera and id want to use it more than i wanted before, especially in the summer. Because my eye sight isnt perfect (but not so bad i think i would need glasses normally(they still gave me free glasses in sivilian service) and there is no diopetric adjustment on the camera the camera wasnt fun to use because couldnt see info or the focus points clearly and focus looked off when it wasnt. But i made my own diopetric lens from the glasses i got from the sivilian service

, lens on them was made from plastic, so it was quite easy to make. Now that i can use it better i would want to use it more.
I allso forgot to add that i would want to buy camera bag, but maybe ill just buy it even if i dont sell the 50 1.2. I was thinking this bag
http://java script: olc(\Hahhaa nah i dont keep weed there, and i have never even seen so much weed that would fill the pockets. They can fit 1litre juice container(what ever its called), with the pocket closed
This post was edited by Tomes on Feb 25 2009 03:02pm