Well it's kinda hard to just focus on just one subject in a panoramic landscape photo I am sure he just wanted to show the magnificent view he saw with his eyes and to me it does look amazing .

i'm not denying the amazing factor of this photo but it needs a dominant subject imo ... cause i think some of the awesomeness of this view is lost without a dominant

Well I guess I'll have to agree to disagree with you especially when it comes to panoramic landscape/cityscape photos which the main objective is to have as much of the interesting and/or amazing view as possible in the picture.
If you want you should check out this site: http://www.panoguide.com/howto/;jsessionid=6A499FF9CEBEC29CC27A8CBBD6762675
It got some really amazing panoramic photos and many of them don't really have a dominant subject or whatever.

maybe its just i'm perked up on coffee and my eyes flicking from left to right lookin for something to pay attention to and nothing stops it longer than anything else...

i think the pan is a great photo to bad you coulndnt shoot with a fish eye or a wide angle maybe catch more of the buildings...nice photo

This picture amazes me in the way the big building looks as if you can see through it....

I used a 24mm wide angle.
The windows are a bit small so it wasn't exactly possible to go farther without having a huge window frame in the middle lol!


@SS_avenger, A panoramic is meant to give you a breathtaking view over a large area, your eyes should go left to right/right to left etc. as you look across the entire pano.

@MotherofTwo, Thank you

as i said i was probably perked up from 2 much coffee and i was probably zipping to fast with my eyes
/edit: just looked @ it again and it was definately the coffee

This post was edited by SS_avenger on Feb 17 2009 11:22pm