@ FuturamaOh, yes thanks for the glossary.
I will post my photos for sure if I got a camera (will take some time tho, need some more infos, compare with other cameras, etc).
And you're right, I'm new to those cameras and i prefer to buy a new one (except i find such a store that got "proved" cameras by canon, as Antichrist- said).
@ bergmannI personally think its not a much difference if I pay 500 or 520, so its no problem.
@ Antichrist-I'm planning to shoot everything I "feel". Things that got a special expression to me, you know what i mean?
Could be everything.. landscapes, cities, people
Well, as I said I always had fun making photos with my cheap camera, but if I review the photos I made its like "damn what a bad quality" (colors are some kind of dirty) and the expression of the photo doesnt come out as it should be.
@ AstragonyYour suggestion couldnt be shorter

, but please leave a reason why you think that way, since there are still some diskussions about which is better (30D or 450D)
Correct me if I'm wrong.
If i understand right XSi = Canon 450D (Rebel XSi)
Theres something confusing me
Quote (bergmann @ Wed, 19 Nov 2008, 06:28)
I did want the 30D, but it's about $200 more than the XSi, and it wasn't worth the extra money for me. If they were the same price I would've probably gotten the 30D. I couldn't justify spending that much more.
Quote (Antichrist- @ Wed, 19 Nov 2008, 11:42)
30d may not be like 10 times better, but its better and way cheaper. Not to mention quality of the body, usability and i bet it has better af allso, what makes the image quality raise. Giving this budget you should compare 450d with kit lens vs 30d with some better lens and then 30d would kick 450d kits ass hard.
In first case 30D is about $200 more than the XSi, in the 2. case 30D is better and cheaper. This is confusing me :/
And could somebody explain me "shutter life"?
Is it like "after this amount of photos the camera will break"?
Regardz
Chris