What i should get D90 or 500D - 550D - 600D and why.
This is my final call I have to upgrade my camera and i want to do this before weekend !
I even force my wife to stop looking on HD video recording mode so basically i can pick w.e witch camera now
I read some many reviews and i came up with this 90D vs 500D but.... (in my opinion)

What I want to do is - b days, party's, weddings, random portraits, landscapes,
What i wont do is any kind a foto reporter things so defo not looking at 35mm frames camera

D90: faster and quiet, better af, white balance, exposure, ttl flash. Better ergonomics. Battery lasts almost twice compared with the 500d.

500D: more megapixels, better video resolution, higer iso.




Get the D90.
Also the kit one comes with better lens than the 500d kit.

Neither. Don't go below 7D/D300 for this.

what would be the problem with the 550D on a wedding besides the AF system?

This post was edited by ace07 on Mar 1 2011 08:13am

Not so much the D550, but the D90 - horrible iso, horrible IQ, and ofc, the AF system will end up making plenty of useless, blurred photos.

ok so or 7D or D300 ?

And what is the problem with nikon D90 ? Like really... why is it bad camera ? in this price range ?

I'd say Nikon d7000 if you don't need the 7d's 8fps or movie shooting capabilities(which even the d7000 has even if a bit inferior).

This post was edited by Verdena on Mar 1 2011 08:53am

If you won't go full frame, the D7000 or 7D are your best options. Worthy investment.

oki, how about this one:
nikon D90 vs D7000

+ and - of both

can get d90 for let's say 600-750 with kit lens
d7000 around 1k with kit lens

but why and for what i have to spend 1k to get d7000

http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/78158/show.html

http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/75332/show.html

This post was edited by PANAM on Mar 1 2011 09:39am

this

the d7000 has great iso performance, af, etc