good ones dont degrade the iq(or maybe you could see like 0.01% difference in lab), also good ones arent prone to flaring either, but in extreme situation they might increase the flare really little. i suggest hoya hd filters for protection, they have strong/good coatings(with many filters the coating might go bad if you clean it too much or dont use appropriate cloths/chemicals for cleaning, but hoya hd filters coating doesent fade away even if you just wipe it with your sleeve), they can take about 4 times the hit that normal filters can because they are hardened. some people say that b&w filters are better, but they cost more, they dont have as strong coatings(if you scratch the coating, filter starts to flare easier and decrease iq) and hoya hd filters are already so good that you wont notice the difference with or without the filter.
since you shoot with digital, get protection filter instead of uv filter because digital sensor already has uv filter, uv vs non uv doesent make much of a difference, but filter with uv filtering cost slightly more and i wouldnt think its a good idea to filter anything that you dont need to filter(but in real life it most likely doesent make any difference if you use two uv filters or not)
Quote (Land0n @ 24 Nov 2010 01:46)
The people who argue against using filters say that because the expensive ones costs over ~100 dollars, they would rather not use one and if the front element gets damaged, they could have Canon replace it for the same amount a high end filter would cost
good filters are cheaper than replacing the front element, much cheaper
This post was edited by Antichrist- on Nov 23 2010 04:59pm