yay canon 70-210 f4

Like it? C&C


Now i need only test my new flash lamp 430ex II

1#



2#



3#



4#




5#

wait. you mean the Canon EF 70-200mm 1:4,0 L IS USM for around 1000 bucks? or the one without IS for around 600 bucks? because I gotta say they dont seem to have the Quality of an L lens. They dont seem perfectly sharp and the details also dont look L-like. I guess it could be due to massive post editing, which seems to have taken place here. explain urself !!

I like the #4 the best, because it´s well composed and the lighting / colors / contrasts seems quite right.

Hmm. They do not look perfectly sharp. Do you have any unedited shots ?

In terms of "if I ever upload any of my shots that aren´t unedited", or?

It wasn´t a critique on you, much rather an attempt to find the reason of the problem

and you didnt quite answer my first question. I´ve never seen a 70-210 by canon. I only know sigma has a 70-210. Canon produces the 70-200mm 2.8 L, the 70-200mm 4 with image stabilizer and one without. so which one do you have?

Haha. RecoveryChannel take a look at the auther.

ah gnarf. That happens if you surf around in 2 different topics ( yours, and this ) at the same time. >.<

EDIT: And oh, you meant the 70-210 f4 from 1987....... didnt know about that
Then I take back everything I said before. the problems about the shots remain tho

This post was edited by RecoveryChannel on Jul 13 2010 03:52pm

I think hes talking about non-L 70-210 f/4

ye as you might see in my edit, I realized that aswell now

Oh i didn't see the edit lol.

This.

It's kind of hurting my eyes. Iso: Unedited version!

5 is the coolest by the way

This post was edited by SeaBas on Jul 13 2010 04:16pm