Quote (onepagememory @ Feb 28 2010 10:34pm)
Looking to buy:
EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM Lens
Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Total: 3488.00
Will be using with my trusty 5D Mark II.
Nice lens choices. They're all exceptional glass.
But do you really need the IS for the Macro lens? I know it could be alot more versatile depending on how you use it, but it's essentially the same optics as the non-is version which is approx half the price.
No comment on the 24-70 but as for the 70-200 f/4L IS. What are you using it for? Reason i asked is because if you're doing sports photography etc. The f/2.8 non-is could prove very useful, but the downside is that it isnt' as sharp as the f/4L IS version.