d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > 18 55mm And A Wide Angle Or A Few Tamaron Lenses?
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,952
Joined: Sep 25 2007
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
May 29 2009 10:33pm
Just curious; are Tamron (i think) lenses any good or is it just a good idea to start with the standard 18 55 when I buy an slr next week?

This post was edited by XslayaX on May 29 2009 10:34pm
Member
Posts: 10,641
Joined: Oct 11 2006
Gold: 60.00
May 30 2009 02:41am
Quote (XslayaX @ Sat, 30 May 2009, 06:33)
Just curious; are Tamron (i think) lenses any good or is it just a good idea to start with the standard 18 55 when I buy an slr next week?


What camera are you going to buy ? :)
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
May 30 2009 12:44pm
Hmm - I used a Tamron AF28-80mm F/3.5-5.6 instead of my 15-85 mm kit lens and I liked it a lot more. You could zoom it a lot farther with the one I had. I'd say they are decent lenses, but I've only had one lens. :)
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
May 30 2009 01:33pm
Quote (chantal7 @ Sat, May 30 2009, 12:44pm)
Hmm - I used a Tamron AF28-80mm F/3.5-5.6 instead of my 15-85 mm kit lens and I liked it a lot more. You could zoom it a lot farther with the one I had. I'd say they are decent lenses, but I've only had one lens. :)


lol I have never heard of that 15-85 kit lens before :o is it new? :o xD
I am fairly sure that most of the lenses made by Tamron are better than the EF-S 18-55 II lens BUT I have also read in another forum that the IS version of the Canon kit 18-55 lens is quite sharp.
Member
Posts: 10,641
Joined: Oct 11 2006
Gold: 60.00
May 30 2009 01:35pm
Quote (Futurama @ Sat, 30 May 2009, 21:33)
lol I have never heard of that 15-85 kit lens before :o is it new? :o xD
I am fairly sure that most of the lenses made by Tamron are better than the EF-S 18-55 II lens BUT I have also read in another forum that the IS version of the Canon kit 18-55 lens is quite sharp.


The Canon 15 - 55 IS is better than the version without IS. I also read that somewhere. I think it is good enough for starters. But the sigma 10 - 20 <3.

This post was edited by Qhotex on May 30 2009 01:36pm
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
May 30 2009 02:11pm
Quote (Qhotex @ Sat, May 30 2009, 01:35pm)
The Canon 15 - 55 IS is better than the version without IS. I also read that somewhere. I think it is good enough for starters. But the sigma 10 - 20 <3.


Yeah that's what I was trying to say... lol
hmm 15-55 IS.... It's like all of the sudden Canon has release a bunch of new lenses or something :O hahah nah I am just bugging you guys :p

Yerah I really love the Sigma 10-20!!!! but the downside is it's extremely short maximum focal length :(
Member
Posts: 10,641
Joined: Oct 11 2006
Gold: 60.00
May 30 2009 02:18pm
Quote (Futurama @ Sat, 30 May 2009, 22:11)
Yeah that's what I was trying to say... lol
hmm 15-55 IS.... It's like all of the sudden Canon has release a bunch of new lenses or something :O hahah nah I am just bugging you guys :p

Yerah I really love the Sigma 10-20!!!! but the downside is it's extremely short maximum focal length :(


Dammit! I was trying to get it right, but I also failed. :(

Oh. I was thinking of using it as a landscape and cityscape lens, but I can hear it is not good at stuff like that ?
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
May 30 2009 02:30pm
Quote (Qhotex @ Sat, May 30 2009, 02:18pm)
Dammit! I was trying to get it right, but I also failed. :(

Oh. I was thinking of using it as a landscape and cityscape lens, but I can hear it is not good at stuff like that ?


Basically you would need two lenses for general cityscape photos and especially if you want to capture people or smaller objects or what to get nice bokeh. I believe if you have money you should get two bodies, one with the Sigma lens and the other using ef 24-105 f/4L IS... which reminds me that I really need to find a better job sooooooon! lol
Member
Posts: 10,641
Joined: Oct 11 2006
Gold: 60.00
May 30 2009 02:40pm
Quote (Futurama @ Sat, 30 May 2009, 22:30)
Basically you would need two lenses for general cityscape photos and especially if you want to capture people or smaller objects or what to get nice bokeh. I believe if you have money you should get two bodies, one with the Sigma lens and the other using ef 24-105 f/4L IS... which reminds me that I really need to find a better job sooooooon! lol


I am going to buy a better body and the 300mm 4L from Canon. Maybe something similar. I hate to shift lenses all the time. xD
Haha. I am looking for one! But I can not find one. :(
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
May 31 2009 01:15am
Quote (Qhotex @ Sat, May 30 2009, 02:40pm)
I am going to buy a better body and the 300mm 4L from Canon. Maybe something similar. I hate to shift lenses all the time. xD
Haha. I am looking for one! But I can not find one. :(


haha :p hmm I have heard that the ef 70-200 f/2.8 IS + Canon extender 1.4x are also a very good combination. I am sure most of the time you wouldn't need the extender to boost focal length then you would have one of the best 70-200 lens out there :p but as usual it's not cheap lol. I am sure you can find a used 40D quite cheap unless you want to pay more for the inferior 50D :p
Go Back To Photography Topic List
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll