Quote (Qhotex @ Mon, May 11 2009, 02:58pm)
50D has the Digic 4. And 5MP more. I like to get my photos LARGE on the wall.

I think you really should read some of the reviews first especially about the HUGE megapixel gain. It's more of a downside than a good thing...
Believe me I did some research before I bought my second 40D

From Dpreview.com:
Quote
Detailed and clean image output (but not as detailed as we would have expected from a 15 megapixels sensor)
Conclusion - Cons
* High ISO performance worse than 40D
* Reduced dynamic range in the shadow areas compared to EOS 40D
* Per-pixel detail not as good as on good 10 or 12 megapixel cameras
* High-end lenses required to get the most out of the camera
* Poor white balance performance under artificial light
* Flash must be up for AF assist lamp (although AF is good even in low light)
* Live view not as accurate as on 40D (framing very slightly off-center, in contrast detect AF mode not possible to magnify right out to the extreme corners)
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos50d/http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EOS-50D-Digital-SLR-Camera-Review.aspxIf you scroll down a lil bit you will see the difference in high ISO performance between 40D and 50D

You will need some very sharp and expensive lenses for that camera...
Quote
As pixel density increases, lens aberrations are magnified and more readily apparent at a 100% viewing size. Thus, higher quality optics are required to make optimal use of each pixel. This is another blow to the slow lenses as they are often of a lower optical quality as well. Of course, if necessary, you can always reduce the size of the 50D pics to get the same or better quality images that a lower resolution body delivers from a lower quality lens or narrow aperture setting.
Increased pixel density also exaggerates any camera shake at capture time - increasing the value and need for IS or a good support.
This post was edited by Futurama on May 11 2009 03:13pm