d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Soulfly > Part 1/2
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Mar 24 2009 02:22pm
I bought the scanner and took two of 4 films i shot in the concert to developing. naturally those idiots cant do it right and fucked up a little, but luckily that b&w film was taken same spot as the color one. These are scanned from negatives, theyr prints didnt show all the mistakes, but they were really soft and b&w prints had some weird white spots on them(that doesent show on negatives).. I planned of developing all of the 3 b&w films myself, but took one of them to shop because my tank can only take 2 rolls at the time(i dont want to waste chemicals) and i wanted to see if there is much of a difference on film developed myself and on the shop(and hopefully there will be). Color film was kodak fabrwelt 400 iso and b&w was ilford 3200 iso

It was really hard to take these pics from the crowd, but thise were from the "easy" spot.

First heres two extra pics shot day before the concert.







This post was edited by Antichrist- on Mar 24 2009 02:36pm
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Mar 24 2009 02:24pm




Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Mar 24 2009 02:25pm




Member
Posts: 3,996
Joined: Oct 2 2008
Gold: 20.46
Mar 24 2009 02:28pm
I like this film effect, I think they almost look a bit more interesting than done with digital.
The vintage grainy feel is what I like, and that little hair/dust particles. (From the scanner or the camera??)
Member
Posts: 29,057
Joined: Aug 3 2005
Gold: 13.37
Mar 24 2009 02:28pm




and heres one from the warm up band named incite, singer of this band is son of soulflys singer



Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ Tue, 24 Mar 2009, 22:28)
I like this film effect, I think they almost look a bit more interesting than done with digital.
The vintage grainy feel is what I like, and that little hair/dust particles. (From the scanner or the camera??)


scratches(or dust to wet film) from the crappy developing i think, because i cleaned the negatives and checked that theres no visible dust on them

I had to shoot from crowd like this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjOP_xemr7Q

This post was edited by Antichrist- on Mar 24 2009 02:31pm
Member
Posts: 17,591
Joined: Oct 30 2005
Gold: 0.00
Mar 24 2009 02:31pm
soulfly is the shit!

nice pictures dude
Member
Posts: 3,248
Joined: Mar 21 2008
Gold: 2,721.01
Mar 24 2009 02:42pm
Quote (TheBlackRose66 @ Tue, Mar 24 2009, 08:28pm)
I like this film effect, I think they almost look a bit more interesting than done with digital.
The vintage grainy feel is what I like, and that little hair/dust particles. (From the scanner or the camera??)


me too i really like the natural grain. Quality pictures produced by a camera which uses a 100 year old technique
Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Mar 10 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 24 2009 06:42pm
Nice pics man, they really look awesome..
too bad about the vagely effect from the shitty developing..

wink.gif but they're cool tongue.gif
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Mar 25 2009 12:29am
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3612/3383204830_43e8dd28f1_o.jpg

I see a very long... string-like booger tongue.gif

I love the black and white film, I miss taking pics with them. I want to buy an SLR film camera someday.

Good series of photos, film gives them a better feeling when I look at the pics.
Member
Posts: 21,066
Joined: Dec 16 2005
Gold: 100.07
Mar 25 2009 02:05am
Great photos, prefer the black and white to the colour personally, but they both came out very well.

That Ilford Delta 3200 sure has a fucking lot of grain though.
Go Back To Photography Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll