d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Graphic Design > Photography > Futurama's Extreme Macro Pictures > Lol
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Feb 23 2009 01:18am
Ok! I tried to take some reversed macro pictures earlier and out of the almost 30 pictures I took only few of them have visible details and those are like extremely close too rolleyes.gif. I don't really get it I have a 17-85mm lens and I was using the reversed 17mm when I took those pics and I had to hold my camera close to the object which is an old silver coin to get any kind of sharp details...

You can almost see germs and crap in those pictures lol.

#1


#2 I didn't know the surface of my new desk is that uneven because it looks all nice and almost polished and shiny with my eyes lol.


#3


This post was edited by Futurama on Feb 23 2009 01:19am
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Feb 23 2009 01:22am
most of the pictures I look like this:
probably because I didn't hold the lens/camera close enough.


Member
Posts: 11,760
Joined: Nov 1 2007
Gold: 0.25
Feb 23 2009 01:22am
I think its amazing what cameras can do lol, these pictures are a good example.
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Feb 23 2009 01:25am
Quote (teltic @ Mon, Feb 23 2009, 01:22am)
I think its amazing what cameras can do lol, these pictures are a good example.


Well it was accidental and I didn't mean to take pictures like those lol. I think my lens just enlarged the object too much. sleep.gif
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Feb 23 2009 11:00am
lol - now you have to try what Tomes said to do: (notice how you have such a little focus area? Try something like F11 lol)

Quote (Tomes @ Mon, Feb 16 2009, 01:00am)
I got a tip for you.

You can put higher f-number on the lens, but adjusting f-number first, holding down the dof preview button and taking the lens off the camera at same time, now the f-number selected will stay on the lens after you remove it. If you remove the lens normally lens will be wide open and naturally focused area will be really(too) small.


This post was edited by chantal7 on Feb 23 2009 11:00am
Member
Posts: 1,281
Joined: Jul 30 2007
Gold: 0.00
Feb 23 2009 02:42pm
craaaaaaaaaaaaap
Banned
Posts: 46,474
Joined: Jun 7 2006
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 40%
Feb 23 2009 02:50pm
#2 would look pretty good if the DoF was a bit bigger.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Feb 23 2009 03:25pm
Quote (ClanBK @ Mon, Feb 23 2009, 02:50pm)
#2 would look pretty good if the DoF was a bit bigger.


Yep.... that's what I meant in my previous post.
Member
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Feb 4 2006
Gold: 8.09
Feb 23 2009 04:31pm
Quote (chantal7 @ Mon, Feb 23 2009, 03:25pm)
Yep.... that's what I meant in my previous post.


Yeah I am going to try that now. Actually I used the widest aperture on purpose. I did as Tomes told you and chose the widest aperture because I thought I would get some nice background blur but I didn't know my lens would focus on just a tiny part of the coin when it's reversed ohmy.gif.
Member
Posts: 21,796
Joined: Sep 26 2005
Gold: 895.69
Feb 23 2009 04:36pm
Quote (Futurama @ Mon, Feb 23 2009, 04:31pm)
Yeah I am going to try that now. Actually I used the widest aperture on purpose. I did as Tomes told you and chose the widest aperture because I thought I would get some nice background blur but I didn't know my lens would focus on just a tiny part of the coin when it's reversed ohmy.gif.


Ummm... well uh, if you did what Tomes said, then how come you get barely even anything showing? Just a tiny part of it revealed.

If you remove the lens normally lens will be wide open and naturally focused area will be really(too) small.

This post was edited by chantal7 on Feb 23 2009 04:36pm
Go Back To Photography Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll