Quote (Futurama @ Mon, Dec 15 2008, 03:08am)
yeah you are probably right but I do have a decent lens which I bought with the 40D I had before, ef-s 17-85 IS USM. I will probably wait for a couple of months before I decide to buy another lens. My dilemma now is whether if it is worth spending 400 dollars more on a camera that has similar or worse higher ISO performance and according to Dpreview almost identical image quality as 40D. The only thing that I really like about the 50D is it's much better main LCD but I would be stupid if I'll buy it only for that.

I wouldn't mind getting a 5D but I just do not want to buy a used one or spending 2-3k on a new camera because I kinda want to buy a car next year

so I will be able to drive around and take pics when the spring arrives

I'd go for better ISO performance, I don't know much about cameras, but I know my camera, at 1600 ISO - it's damn annoying. I alwayssssssssss get a noisy picture, no matter what. So I find myself NEVER using ISO 1600 (and that's the highest it can go on my camera). I wish I could go higher, so I don't have to use a tripod so many times. But what do I know, there could even be a way to use that 1600 ISO, without noise, but I don't even know about it