T[fg Pwnage Bm A Gm Sorc And Thinks Hes Good - Topic

Abyssal_Wrath

Banned

Posts: 987

Joined: Nov 24 2006

Gold: 46.00

Warn: 50%

#11

Dec 31 2006 07:46pm

Quote (Hustl3r @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:45am)

Quote (myke @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:43am)

t[o cliams it was a bm vs bm but snp only had extra b manas, he was fadeing, sorbing , fcing ... it was unfair imo
stop amkeing posts t[o

ANY PART OF BM MAKES THE WHOLE THING BM. THUS 16X BMANA CLEARLY MAKES THE WHOLE DUEL BM. I'M DONE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BM/GM.

to start fc isnt bm ? o_o

thatkid

Banned

Posts: 4,197

Joined: Oct 15 2006

Gold: Locked

Trader: Scammer

Warn: 60%

#12

Dec 31 2006 07:46pm

g4u~ bm is bm no matter how u look at it theres not lvls of bm its gm and bm stop making excuses or trying to stick up for sum1~

i admit snp has a very nice sorc(tank) but greg obviously won more bm vs bm

Civic

Member

Posts: 13,481

Joined: Jul 20 2006

Gold: 301.37

#13

Dec 31 2006 07:47pm

Quote (Abyssal_Wrath @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:46am)

Quote (Hustl3r @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:45am)

Quote (myke @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:43am)

t[o cliams it was a bm vs bm but snp only had extra b manas, he was fadeing, sorbing , fcing ... it was unfair imo
stop amkeing posts t[o

ANY PART OF BM MAKES THE WHOLE THING BM. THUS 16X BMANA CLEARLY MAKES THE WHOLE DUEL BM. I'M DONE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BM/GM.

to start fc isnt bm ? o_o

i dont even care anymore , snp was ra'ing so that is bm so no matter what there was no way this was gm. plus it was in public? this is ridiculous.

nelsonian

Banned

Posts: 9,283

Joined: Aug 29 2006

Gold: 3,867.86

Warn: 60%

#14

Dec 31 2006 07:49pm

gah t[g was r/aing too look at his s/s

This post was edited by nelsonian on Dec 31 2006 07:50pm

Abyssal_Wrath

Banned

Posts: 987

Joined: Nov 24 2006

Gold: 46.00

Warn: 50%

#15

Dec 31 2006 07:50pm

Quote (Hustl3r @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:47am)

Quote (Abyssal_Wrath @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:46am)

Quote (Hustl3r @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:45am)

Quote (myke @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:43am)

t[o cliams it was a bm vs bm but snp only had extra b manas, he was fadeing, sorbing , fcing ... it was unfair imo
stop amkeing posts t[o

ANY PART OF BM MAKES THE WHOLE THING BM. THUS 16X BMANA CLEARLY MAKES THE WHOLE DUEL BM. I'M DONE YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BM/GM.

to start fc isnt bm ? o_o

i dont even care anymore , snp was ra'ing so that is bm so no matter what there was no way this was gm. plus it was in public? this is ridiculous.

i dont know any of both im kinda newb lol

but i know what is ra.. if they said gm vs gm and they said ok.. ? and he didnt put ra or w/e ?? if he got ra it doesnt mean he use it all the time

neway fc with sorb/evade/enigma/fade > any es sorc

any newb can play with a fcer

close this all i wanted to say in the other thread

ne1 got slipper ?

Abyssal_Wrath

Banned

Posts: 987

Joined: Nov 24 2006

Gold: 46.00

Warn: 50%

#16

Dec 31 2006 07:51pm

Quote (nelsonian @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:49am)

gah t[g was r/aing too look at his s/s

vouch

on the top right corner.. just seen this ^^

no es sorc can kill a fcer who use fade/ravens/snowclash/fc/ra/

even if the es is the best

my friend with 7k mana on his sorc with 22 bmanas ( was dieing to 1-2 cs with 95% es ) cuz es fucking hurt es..

This post was edited by Abyssal_Wrath on Dec 31 2006 07:53pm

Civic

Member

Posts: 13,481

Joined: Jul 20 2006

Gold: 301.37

#17

Dec 31 2006 07:52pm

greg - ra , fc , sorb , fade
snp - ra , 16x bmana (considered sorb) , probly autojub too

they both bm so it was bm. greg won. thats all im saying.

This post was edited by Hustl3r on Dec 31 2006 07:52pm

Abyssal_Wrath

Banned

Posts: 987

Joined: Nov 24 2006

Gold: 46.00

Warn: 50%

#18

Dec 31 2006 07:57pm

Quote (Hustl3r @ Mon, Jan 1 2007, 01:52am)

greg - ra , fc , sorb , fade
snp - ra , 16x bmana (considered sorb) , probly autojub too

they both bm so it was bm. greg won. thats all im saying.

i dont think if it was bm vs bm.. the guy would have taken an es sorc vs a fcer ..

Woooooom