Suggestion is to have the option to purchase an automatic bump after 4 hours, just like purchasing title features (red bold italic)

Youd have the option to purchase as many quantity as you'd like at say 5fg per.

Lmk if you would find this useful

Voted no since bumps should definitely be kept as a manual feature,

it would be redundant and create a lot of unnecessary traffic if trade topics that have been completed get auto-bumped.

You could say we can set a time limit or allow users to disable it once the trade has been completed or so, but imo having to make a purchase to pre-bump your thread or having to remove your auto bump if you happen to complete the trade would just be just as much of a hassle as to having to bump your thread.

This post was edited by Lionhearted on Nov 7 2022 01:28pm

Voted no

Manually bumping a thread means you re actively on the site and 99% of the time you are ready for a trade
Having it be done automatically means it could be bumped when you are not able to log in and do those trades in a timely manner

Bumps should only be for when you're active. Also artificially inflates post count which is supposed to show you are an active user.

Voted no.

This post was edited by CrackerSJ on Nov 7 2022 01:12pm

Voted no, but I think it would be a good idea if you could manually pay for a bump if it is before the 4 hour mark.

Ty for your input, those are great points.



So youre suggesting paying to early bump mixed feelings about this one

Hey Elyran,

Thanks for the idea. I think there are some applications where it might be useful. However, generally, I think it would create more uncertainty around trading as people might be mislead by the bumps. For example, potential buyers might think that you are ready to trade when you are offline or afk; or somebody who posted an offer might think that your bump denied it when you actually might be interested in it.

Voted no.

Voted no. would abuse this feature to just auto bump for his +1s in his fake trade threads.

ty for your input gentlemen

Voted no for pretty much all the reasons listed above.

Sorry!