d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > Filter Bold / Red Topics In Certain Trading Forums
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 6,318
Joined: Mar 12 2021
Gold: 0.79
May 9 2021 01:58pm
Could put it beside where runewords etc are
Member
Posts: 26,838
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 14,590.50
May 9 2021 04:51pm
Putting a title in bold or red is a personal choice to put it forward. But in no case, a filtering criterion.

I vote no.
Member
Posts: 17,273
Joined: Jul 29 2010
Gold: 10,709.66
Warn: 70%
May 9 2021 05:31pm
Seems like a neat way to enjoy the site. I can see both a buyer and a seller enjoying this kind of experience. This could be good for making trades quickly and effectively too, and the qualify of all that within our community could be good for the site long term. It seems like a good way to enable something like this would be for Recent Customers or Verified Members as an filtration should be added in a fair and viable use factor. In this site suggestions we are filtering members topic purchases here, not runes, so to me this is an interesting way to possibly progress our site and community in the right direction.

Thanks for sharing this idea.

This post was edited by Sempervirens on May 9 2021 05:36pm
Member
Posts: 89,702
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 165,885.69
May 9 2021 05:47pm
Not useful at all.

Voted no.
Member
Posts: 31,927
Joined: Nov 11 2009
Gold: 4,611.00
May 10 2021 07:19am
Quote (Archive @ 10 May 2021 00:51)
Putting a title in bold or red is a personal choice to put it forward. But in no case, a filtering criterion.

I vote no.


Agree with this.

I fail to see a reason why anyone would want this. Filtering runewords, charms and item types like that makes sense, but since when are you looking for specifically bolded/red/italic topic titles?

Voted no as well of course.
Member
Posts: 17,273
Joined: Jul 29 2010
Gold: 10,709.66
Warn: 70%
May 10 2021 09:01am
Quote (swampass69 @ 9 May 2021 12:58)
Could put it beside where runewords etc are


Do you have ideas and reasons you could share to support your suggestion here?

Quote (Orvar @ 10 May 2021 06:19)
Agree with this.

I fail to see a reason why anyone would want this. Filtering runewords, charms and item types like that makes sense, but since when are you looking for specifically bolded/red/italic topic titles?

Voted no as well of course.



I think a good use of this would be for a forum that is very busy, and when one purchases a title topic upgrade. This might be useful during Ladder Resets or other Events going on in games as it would help a users paid topic be in a more noticeable spot, even if it gets bumped a few pages within minutes. As is filtration was not always there, and I believe it was implemented to make trading easier and more desirable. Purchased topics are often easier trades, and include more desirable items or services. This is why I voted Yes here, as I can see this benefiting some users while not really having a negative effect on the entirety of the site.

If one has a long list of stuff, and has purchased a topic title upgrade, then all the more power to them and the community to be able to see that quickly and when desired. As bold does that, and filtration help can do that, I vote yes in principle.

P.S. This site suggestion reminded me of this section of our site. https://forums.d2jsp.org/forum.php?f=115
Member
Posts: 6,318
Joined: Mar 12 2021
Gold: 0.79
May 10 2021 09:04am
Quote (Sempervirens @ May 10 2021 11:01am)
Do you have ideas and reasons you could share to support your suggestion here?


Tbh I'm sick of seeing the end of ladder ft lists that sell garbage items so I figured it would be easier to filter out the "more serious" or "better item" trades quickly instead of just clicking page to page and checking the bold/red title names.

This post was edited by swampass69 on May 10 2021 09:05am
Member
Posts: 144,627
Joined: Jun 2 2006
Gold: 5,280.75
May 10 2021 09:09am
Voted no

But.... Recent Customers or Verified Members should have to pay triple what everyone else would have to pay if this were to be implemented. Then I would agree.
Member
Posts: 31,927
Joined: Nov 11 2009
Gold: 4,611.00
May 10 2021 09:29am
Quote (Sempervirens @ 10 May 2021 17:01)
Do you have ideas and reasons you could share to support your suggestion here?




I think a good use of this would be for a forum that is very busy, and when one purchases a title topic upgrade. This might be useful during Ladder Resets or other Events going on in games as it would help a users paid topic be in a more noticeable spot, even if it gets bumped a few pages within minutes. As is filtration was not always there, and I believe it was implemented to make trading easier and more desirable. Purchased topics are often easier trades, and include more desirable items or services. This is why I voted Yes here, as I can see this benefiting some users while not really having a negative effect on the entirety of the site.

If one has a long list of stuff, and has purchased a topic title upgrade, then all the more power to them and the community to be able to see that quickly and when desired. As bold does that, and filtration help can do that, I vote yes in principle.

P.S. This site suggestion reminded me of this section of our site. https://forums.d2jsp.org/forum.php?f=115


The suggestion was specifically within D2 trading, as he wanted it next to ”Runewords”. Filtering was implemented so people could look for more specific things among the thousands of topics, bolded/red aren’t categories people actively look for. Nor do I agree that bolded/red topics are generally ”easier” trades.

The negative aspect to this is only that it’s completely useless and is such a weird way to filter something that doesn’t make sense in any way. It would also clutter up the site.
Member
Posts: 2,305
Joined: Feb 3 2021
Gold: 261.00
May 10 2021 10:26am
Quote (ALBINO_RHINO @ May 10 2021 05:09pm)
Voted no

But.... Recent Customers or Verified Members should have to pay triple what everyone else would have to pay if this were to be implemented. Then I would agree.


agreed and Sempervirenses shouldn't have these rights at all

This post was edited by bhasinse on May 10 2021 10:27am
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll