Not sure if this has been suggested before but,
it would be nice to see if the person you're about to trade with has ever been accused of scamming or bming, you can see how solid the proof against them is.

Not everyone gets locked because there's not enough evidence perhaps. I see threads with vouches saying "yeah, that person bm'd me too" which doesn't necessarily give them a warning % but it'd be a good reason to make them go first.

Good for avoiding risks imo.

This post was edited by Foxic on Apr 27 2014 10:00pm

No for me

That's why meds are implemented here.

You wouldn't get scammed if you used the correct precautions

This would be very useful! Yes from me

If I had to use a med for every single trade I did for d3, I'd be waiting for one almost all the time.

That's the risk you take if you don't use meds.

It would be unrealistic for everyone to use a med for every trade, the subforum economy would slow down immensely (i.e less profit and the effort to wait for a med team who doesn't have enough people to accomodate so many posts)

Voted no, if you have any doubt about your trade, use a mediator.

good idea, voted yes.
not just for trading, would be ideal to look into people that do level jobs/rushes etc..





plz...

This post was edited by Cheetos on Apr 27 2014 10:31pm

See the post above you.

In addition, many people would retract/lose interest because they don't want to wait for a med to respond.

Some people change over time, they might have had a bad past which resulted in wrong decisions like scamming. People who wish to better themselves or correct their mistakes would be facing great issues, if their history was on display like that. Everyone would simply refuse to trade with them.

It's a No from me, as I find it counter-productive for those users who wish to reform or restore their reputation as traders and users on d2jsp.

It has previously been hinted at or partially suggested here - both times denied:
- Scammer Tags
- Overhaul The Scammer Accusation Section?