d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > Site Suggestion Helpers > For A Better D2jsp!
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 18,797
Joined: Feb 4 2007
Gold: 2,092.86
Dec 14 2014 04:59pm
No sorry.
most of the mods don't do the codes and dont actually know the effects and what not on trying to implement something.

Member
Posts: 18,660
Joined: May 16 2007
Gold: 4,405.00
Dec 15 2014 12:25am
Yep
Member
Posts: 28,349
Joined: Mar 13 2006
Gold: 450.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 15 2014 12:31am
Mostly, I think it would great for a list to be composed showing all site suggestions that have already been denied by category. This list could be maintained by a helper.
Other than that, I think njaguar is aware of most of the suggestions here.
Member
Posts: 126,171
Joined: Oct 14 2009
Gold: 0.00
Dec 15 2014 12:47am
I'd be excited to help if needed. I like the idea.
Member
Posts: 4,829
Joined: Sep 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Dec 16 2014 04:38pm
Quote (Sire @ Dec 14 2014 06:37pm)
Voted no

Every site suggestion is reviewed so this isn't needed.


Thanks for your input!

Is there any confirmation of this information? I question it due to the amount of great suggestions that simply don't make sense why they are not in effect, even at the most simple effort of application.


Quote (Z3RG @ Dec 14 2014 06:44pm)
I also voted No. there is more things that mods need to worry about then site suggestions. they already do look over these.


Thanks for your input aswell!

But > Not enough mods to go around = not enough staffing revolve / too big of a site for it's own staff

This logic would be invalid due to the standing of the staff's and admin's verbal apparel that they are capable of handling any and all issues within their ranks abilities, if they feel too short on staff, people will move up.


Quote (Fallen619 @ Dec 14 2014 06:59pm)
No sorry.
most of the mods don't do the codes and dont actually know the effects and what not on trying to implement something.


I assume your speaking of when something would need written in code to be implemented? that's up to njaguar to decide :o

As for not knowing the effects of implementing Site Additions, this is like saying Moderators don't know enough about D2jsp :blink:


Quote (Popl @ Dec 15 2014 02:25am)
Yep


Thanks for your vote!

Quote (Joshawarrior @ Dec 15 2014 02:31am)
Mostly, I think it would great for a list to be composed showing all site suggestions that have already been denied by category. This list could be maintained by a helper.
Other than that, I think njaguar is aware of most of the suggestions here.


To sort all the suggestions by denied rather than approved would take a ton of work though :o

Quote (Madmartigan @ Dec 15 2014 02:47am)
I'd be excited to help if needed. I like the idea.


Thanks.

Bump!
Retired Moderator
Posts: 115,464
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 33,791.94
Trader: Trusted
Dec 16 2014 04:40pm
I like the idea in some ways, but in some ways I think it could be opinionated/biased.

From what I know about Paul, he actually views each and every suggestion. That's always been impressive to me.
Member
Posts: 4,829
Joined: Sep 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Dec 18 2014 12:53pm
Quote (AspenSniper @ Dec 16 2014 06:40pm)
I like the idea in some ways, but in some ways I think it could be opinionated/biased.

From what I know about Paul, he actually views each and every suggestion. That's always been impressive to me.


It could be opinionated indeed and well that's part of the point, however a strong part of the point would be that it simply be voted and in the moderators eyes, worthy of overlook.

Thank you for your input Dylan :)

I look forward to him viewing THIS suggestion if this information is so accurate, whether he find it to be negative or positive.
Trade Moderator
Posts: 27,986
Joined: Dec 20 2005
Gold: 149,175.00
Trader: Trusted
Dec 18 2014 12:54pm
Quote (Sire @ Dec 15 2014 01:37am)
Voted no

Every site suggestion is reviewed so this isn't needed.


Agree .
Voted No.
Junior Moderator
Posts: 29,558
Joined: May 30 2008
Gold: 6,320.69
Trader: Trusted
Dec 18 2014 02:41pm
I can see the good point about this, but for me, this isn't really needed. Every staff member looks over these, and I know for a fact that both Paul and Kevin check these out as well. It could also be extremely unorganized, as it would be hard to tell who has already viewed the suggestion and forwarded it.
But then again, I don't think that there really is a super efficient way of working a suggestion forum, to be honest. It's not a bad idea, but i don't see enough benefit.

I voted no, I'm sorry. :(
Member
Posts: 4,829
Joined: Sep 12 2011
Gold: 0.00
Dec 18 2014 03:48pm
Quote (Creations @ Dec 18 2014 04:41pm)
I can see the good point about this, but for me, this isn't really needed. Every staff member looks over these, and I know for a fact that both Paul and Kevin check these out as well. It could also be extremely unorganized, as it would be hard to tell who has already viewed the suggestion and forwarded it.
But then again, I don't think that there really is a super efficient way of working a suggestion forum, to be honest. It's not a bad idea, but i don't see enough benefit.

I voted no, I'm sorry. :(


Thank you for your input :)

I hope to see that Paul/Kevin confirm they do look over them, I've seen Paul post/close a few saying yes and no but they've been months apart / months ago, for all the great suggestions out there that deserve attention, they just don't seem to get it even after a crazy amount of votes.

As for telling who already forwarded it, it really wouldn't be a big deal seeing as the more people who forward it, the more people it makes more sense to, to be implemented. Being forwarded by 2-3 different Moderators would only make the point that it's a serious matter.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll