d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > General Help > Site Suggestions >
Poll > Guild Message All? > Group Message For Guilds
Prev123Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 15,582
Joined: Oct 17 2008
Gold: 226.37
Trader: Trusted
Member
Posts: 9,532
Joined: Dec 15 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jul 7 2013 08:54am
I voted yes because not a single person in this thread has any one reason to vote no.

If you say no be specific like "No, no one lets me in their guild so I vote no"

Or "no, my penis is too small sorry"

xD
Member
Posts: 52,349
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 9,010.00
Jul 7 2013 10:51am
Quote (Morot @ Jul 7 2013 09:38am)



This thread was like 5 years ago.

I understand no means no but maybe with how much this website has grown I believe it would be a good thing to consider again.



Quote (polo_vash @ Jul 7 2013 09:54am)
I voted yes because not a single person in this thread has any one reason to vote no. 

If you say no be specific like "No, no one lets me in their guild so I vote no"

Or "no, my penis is too small sorry"

xD


lol Notice the only people saying no are ones who don't own a guild.

Member
Posts: 22,779
Joined: Sep 19 2006
Gold: 5,500.00
Trader: Trusted
Jul 7 2013 12:11pm
Well the idea is not bad, but for me we don't need it.
In my eyes, Guild Topic is enough. People just need to track it, and try to be active at least a minimum.

In first, how do you manage the "wait a short period" time we generally have between 2 pm when you want to pm one after one? it count as 1 PM so a guild where you have 100 member, you send it the same message to the whole guild in one time? So the time is remove?
In second, how do you manage with a big guild, if all the members decide to send you an answer? We up the pm box of the leader?

Voted no sorry.

This post was edited by Nico on Jul 7 2013 12:13pm
Member
Posts: 52,349
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 9,010.00
Jul 7 2013 12:13pm
Quote (Nico @ Jul 7 2013 01:11pm)
Well the idea is not bad, but for me we don't need it.
In my eyes, Guild Topic is enough. People just need to track it, and try to be active at least a minimum.

In first, how do you manage the time we generally have between 2 pm? it count as 1 PM so a guild where you have 100 member, you send it the same message to the whole guild in one time? So the time is remove?
In second, how do you manage with a big guild, if all the members decide to send you an answer? We up the pm box of the leader?

Voted no sorry.


So the max pm thing would raise a good question, I will give you that and yes I would imagine the pm max would have to be up'd.


All of this could be at an FG cost to upgrade but I guarantee almost every guild leader would pay for it.


Once again, for non guild owners it Is hard to see the benefit, I understand that, but as stated a couple times here, it would be amazingly helpful to those who are actually in charge of the guild.


and if it is something that is paid for, Those who think its a dumb idea, don't have to pay for it.


This post was edited by Endure on Jul 7 2013 12:18pm
Member
Posts: 22,779
Joined: Sep 19 2006
Gold: 5,500.00
Trader: Trusted
Jul 7 2013 12:21pm
Quote (Endure @ 7 Jul 2013 20:13)
So the max pm thing would raise a good question, I will give you that and yes I would imagine the pm max would have to be up'd.


All of this could be at an FG cost to upgrade but I guarantee almost every guild leader would pay for it.


Once again, for non guild owners it Is hard to see the benefit, I understand that, but as stated a couple times here, it would be amazingly helpful to those who are actually in charge of the guild.


I will give you the answer.
The time is not going to be remove. And the pm box is not going to be up, this is for staff members. (already suggested a lot of time)
And versus fg the answer will stay a no.
About the last part, I was myself a guild leader, and I'm currently a co-leader in my current guild, and I still don't see the positive about this suggestion and also if you think about the 2 things I mentioned. For me again one time the guild topic is enough.

This post was edited by Nico on Jul 7 2013 12:21pm
Member
Posts: 52,349
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 9,010.00
Jul 7 2013 12:48pm
Quote (Nico @ Jul 7 2013 01:21pm)
I will give you the answer.
The time is not going to be remove. And the pm box is not going to be up, this is for staff members. (already suggested a lot of time)
And versus fg the answer will stay a no.
About the last part, I was myself a guild leader, and I'm currently a co-leader in my current guild, and I still don't see the positive about this suggestion and also if you think about the 2 things I mentioned. For me again one time the guild topic is enough.


That is fine, I appreciate your answers and opinions.


I'm not sure what you mean by time but if you mean between pms like the waiting time? I would imagine it would just be the same since this is one message to multiple users at once.
Member
Posts: 22,779
Joined: Sep 19 2006
Gold: 5,500.00
Trader: Trusted
Jul 7 2013 01:04pm
Quote (Endure @ 7 Jul 2013 20:48)
That is fine, I appreciate your answers and opinions.


I'm not sure what you mean by time but if you mean between pms like the waiting time? I would imagine it would just be the same since this is one message to multiple users at once.


Correct, I mean this "You must wait a short period of time before you may send another private message."
You have it when you send a pm to one person, and you want to send one other directly after. (15 secondes between each)
For me it can't be the same if you compare send one message to one person, and send for exemple one message to 300 members
Add this feature, could only add other problems, I wrote 2, but maybe possible to find more.

Quote (Endure @ 7 Jul 2013 21:10)
I understand that concern, and for this function I don't see why it couldn't be considered 1 message since its the same going out to the guild.


This function is only for the Guild OWNER, No one else. So, it would not be abused.

Once again, this seems to be small things that would make this forum just that much better.


Well, I can understand why you want it, but this was just my opinion, I'm not the person who take the decision to add it or not.
But with my post, maybe they can release things we didn't have in mind on the moment. So good luck with your suggestion :)

Quote (Xaysia @ 7 Jul 2013 21:17)
The waiting time would be unrealistic when adding such a feature - why not remove the timer and instead make only guild leaders available to send one of those mass PMs per day?

I would of course see this feature managed the other way around - Instead of getting replies to this PM, why not it more of a "no reply" PM, that is sent out to everyone in the guild to let them know if a new application has been made and they need to vote, or if a new guild event is being arranged and discussed?

I would love to see this feature being implemented.


For me add this feature and remove the wainting time is to give a big privilege. So I don't see why it would be implanted. You make it, after people could ask to have the wainting time remove everywhere.
After for the No reply, it's as when you block a person, and I also don't see why the admin could have this privilege, I mean if the person of the guild want to pm back, he should be able to do it.

And after, it's just my opinion, don't take it bad :)

This post was edited by Nico on Jul 7 2013 01:34pm
Member
Posts: 52,349
Joined: Jan 20 2008
Gold: 9,010.00
Jul 7 2013 01:10pm
Quote (Nico @ Jul 7 2013 02:04pm)
Correct, I mean this "You must wait a short period of time before you may send another private message."
You have it when you send a pm to one person, and you want to send one other directly after. (15 secondes between each)
For me it can't be the same if you compare send one message to one person, and send for exemple one message to 300 members
Add this feature, could only add other problems, I wrote 2, but maybe possible to find more.


I understand that concern, and for this function I don't see why it couldn't be considered 1 message since its the same going out to the guild.


This function is only for the Guild OWNER, No one else. So, it would not be abused.

Once again, this seems to be small things that would make this forum just that much better.
Member
Posts: 13,981
Joined: Dec 9 2007
Gold: 1,735.00
Trader: Trusted
Jul 7 2013 01:17pm
Quote (Nico @ 7 Jul 2013 20:11)
Well the idea is not bad, but for me we don't need it.
In my eyes, Guild Topic is enough. People just need to track it, and try to be active at least a minimum.

In first, how do you manage the "wait a short period" time we generally have between 2 pm when you want to pm one after one? it count as 1 PM so a guild where you have 100 member, you send it the same message to the whole guild in one time? So the time is remove?
In second, how do you manage with a big guild, if all the members decide to send you an answer? We up the pm box of the leader?

Voted no sorry.


The waiting time would be unrealistic when adding such a feature - why not remove the timer and instead make only guild leaders available to send one of those mass PMs per day?

I would of course see this feature managed the other way around - Instead of getting replies to this PM, why not it more of a "no reply" PM, that is sent out to everyone in the guild to let them know if a new application has been made and they need to vote, or if a new guild event is being arranged and discussed?

I would love to see this feature being implemented.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Topic List
Prev123Next
Closed New Topic New Poll