why

I vote yes if it costs the same to remove as it did to buy .

i feel like this feature wouldnt be used at all tbh
is there any benefits for the users in that scenario lol
didnt vote though

This post was edited by 123456789 on Apr 29 2020 09:10am

OP has OCD and dislikes having 50/55 members

The suggestion is to increase guild management flexibility. A byproduct of doing so would be increased feature purchases and forum gold purchases to do so.

Some food for thought:
* Some guilds have Guild Topics that have not been posted to in months or years that could be considered an eye sore.
* A guild owner may want to create exclusivity by restricting the number of guild slots available.

Different strokes for different folks. Not everyone may want to remove features to cater to their aesthetic desires but some people may. Regardless, the ability to remove previously added features isn't a novel idea but we presently do not have the ability to do so. Any such changes requires the acquisition of or starting a new guild.

voted yes

A suggestion as a variant of this, is to be able to list guild features for sale, rather than deleting.
Similar to the "Donate for me" function on the site, perhaps have a guild only subforum for guild items to be bought and sold.
I feel as the entire guild system needs a revamp anyway, guilds currently have no value, the only way to get rid of a guild as a guild owner is by one person or another paying to transfer it, there should be a "physical" ownership of guilds and guild items, much like a character and items, so that they're able to be traded, sold, or given away.
Perhaps this could bring back some of the value of a guild.

Votes yes regardless.

Yes if it costs gold.
+1 for gold sinks

I feel maybe not remove, but maybe a hide button or a restart etc that way if guild changes hands or if you decide on bringing something back your able to without needing to buy it back. But if it's less work to work in the delete option go that way. But I know you can hide things in your profile maybe give options to do that if it isn't already there been a while since I looked either way voting yes as something needs to be done.