d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Homework Help > Dynamics Need Help
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 35,671
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 2,130.00
Aug 28 2015 12:56pm
Im confused on how to do part b, do i just find t when x = 0, then plug in the value of t into velocity and acclereation equation?

Member
Posts: 35,671
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 2,130.00
Aug 28 2015 02:38pm
forget problem 1, i figured it out

Member
Posts: 7,721
Joined: Oct 11 2008
Gold: 304.00
Aug 28 2015 04:05pm
Quote (FamilyGuyViewer @ Aug 28 2015 02:38pm)
forget problem 1, i figured it out

http://i.imgur.com/I0pUKFO.png


integral of acceleration from 40 to 100 is = 18mm/s

Member
Posts: 35,671
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 2,130.00
Aug 30 2015 02:47pm
Quote (saber_x3 @ Aug 28 2015 05:05pm)
integral of acceleration from 40 to 100 is = 18mm/s


tat doesnt give u the correct k value, the correct k is .09
Member
Posts: 7,721
Joined: Oct 11 2008
Gold: 304.00
Aug 30 2015 03:53pm
my bad, not with respect to time anymore


with accel equations with position instead of time

use a * dx = v *dv
dx is from 40 to 100
dv is from 0 to 18
you'll get .09 exactly
Member
Posts: 1,799
Joined: Aug 30 2015
Gold: 0.30
Warn: 10%
Aug 30 2015 08:03pm
(b) The first derivative with respect to time is a mathematical method to find the equation for velocity.
TO solve when x=0 you will end up with a polynomial of highest order two after taking the first derivative. At this point you want to resort to either the FOIL factorization method or make quick use of the quadratic formula to find the root(s).

The acceleration is merely the same process, except with the second order derivative.
Member
Posts: 35,671
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 2,130.00
Sep 1 2015 09:37am
Quote (saber_x3 @ Aug 30 2015 04:53pm)
my bad, not with respect to time anymore


with accel equations with position instead of time

use a * dx = v *dv
dx is from 40 to 100
dv is from 0 to 18
you'll get .09 exactly


i did it the other way where instead of using boundaries in the integral, I just integrated both sides and get a constant and i solved for C then after u get C u get k.

is there situations where I should be using ur method instead? If so, can u give an example?
Member
Posts: 7,721
Joined: Oct 11 2008
Gold: 304.00
Sep 2 2015 11:59am
Quote (FamilyGuyViewer @ Sep 1 2015 09:37am)
i did it the other way where instead of using boundaries in the integral, I just integrated both sides and get a constant and i solved for C then after u get C u get k.

is there situations where I should be using ur method instead? If so, can u give an example?


i'm not sure exactly what you did
it's possible you actually got lucky with the boundaries
Member
Posts: 35,671
Joined: Aug 11 2008
Gold: 2,130.00
Sep 5 2015 12:38pm
Quote (saber_x3 @ Sep 2 2015 12:59pm)
i'm not sure exactly what you did
it's possible you actually got lucky with the boundaries


u know how when u integrate without limits, u get a constant? so i did it that way, to get a constant. then i used the two boundaries to solve for the constant, C.

From there ill get k
Go Back To Homework Help Topic List
Add Reply New Topic New Poll