Quote (cialda @ Feb 23 2014 02:03pm)
i believe you start at the cyclohexanone (= position 1) and have the lower number for methyls
so something like
2,5 dimethylcyclohexanone
This is correct.
Curiously no stereochemistry was provided in the OP's drawing. If so, then it would look like 2
S,5
R-dimethylcyclohexanone for a given diastereoisomer, or whichever corresponds to the actual molecule.
This post was edited by Dmon_Hunter on Feb 23 2014 04:03pm