d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Homework Help > Business Question
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 36,472
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 0.44
Sep 16 2013 07:57pm
hhhh
Member
Posts: 32,925
Joined: Jul 23 2006
Gold: 3,804.50
Sep 16 2013 08:06pm
Yes.
Member
Posts: 3,715
Joined: Mar 15 2011
Gold: 4,703.80
Sep 16 2013 08:22pm
What's your question? :unsure:


Member
Posts: 36,472
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 0.44
Sep 17 2013 08:43pm
Okay, so I eliminated B and C obviously and am leaning towards D.

A friend wants to borrow $1500 to attend an inspirational leadership program. He is very intelligent and a hard worker. He hopes to develop his skills as a transformational and charismatic leader, even though he is an extremely introverted person. Is lending him the money a good idea? Explain.
Answer

Yes. Because the friend is highly intelligent and a hard worker, the program is likely to pay off. Intelligence and hard work are keys to becoming a transformational leader.

Yes. Because the friend is an introverted person and a hard worker, the program is likely to pay off. Introversion and hard work are keys to becoming a transformational leader.

No. Because the friend is highly intelligent and a hard worker, the program is not likely to pay off. Intelligence and ability to work hard are not typically traits found in transformational leaders.

No. Because the friend is an introverted person, the program is not likely to pay off. Extraversion, not introversion, is a key to becoming a transformational leader.





Can mobility be measured? The answer is B or D depending. I'm gonna go with d (no) because idk how to measure it


In tennis, Moncef is carrying out a regime to improve his mobility by 25% in the next eight weeks. Does Moncef have SMART goals?
Answer

Yes, because Moncef's goals are specific (mobility), measurable (25%), achievable (with practice), results–based (realistic goal), and time–specific (8 weeks).

Yes, because Moncef's goals are specific (25%), measurable (mobility), achievable (with practice), results–based (realistic goal), and time–specific (8 weeks).

No, because the goals are not time–specific. Eight weeks is too vague a time frame to be specific.

No, because the goals are not measurable. There is no way to measure whether a person's mobility in tennis has improved by 25%.
Banned
Posts: 4,377
Joined: Dec 25 2012
Gold: 13,953.01
Warn: 10%
Sep 17 2013 11:23pm
Quote (Rebuy @ Sep 17 2013 09:43pm)
Okay, so I eliminated B and C obviously and am leaning towards D.

A friend wants to borrow $1500 to attend an inspirational leadership program. He is very intelligent and a hard worker. He hopes to develop his skills as a transformational and charismatic leader, even though he is an extremely introverted person. Is lending him the money a good idea? Explain.
Answer
 
Yes. Because the friend is highly intelligent and a hard worker, the program is likely to pay off. Intelligence and hard work are keys to becoming a transformational leader.
 
Yes. Because the friend is an introverted person and a hard worker, the program is likely to pay off. Introversion and hard work are keys to becoming a transformational leader.
 
No. Because the friend is highly intelligent and a hard worker, the program is not likely to pay off. Intelligence and ability to work hard are not typically traits found in transformational leaders.
 
No. Because the friend is an introverted person, the program is not likely to pay off. Extraversion, not introversion, is a key to becoming a transformational leader.





Can mobility be measured? The answer is B or D depending. I'm gonna go with d (no) because idk how to measure it


In tennis, Moncef is carrying out a regime to improve his mobility by 25% in the next eight weeks. Does Moncef have SMART goals?
Answer
 
Yes, because Moncef's goals are specific (mobility), measurable (25%), achievable (with practice), results–based (realistic goal), and time–specific (8 weeks).
 
Yes, because Moncef's goals are specific (25%), measurable (mobility), achievable (with practice), results–based (realistic goal), and time–specific (8 weeks).
 
No, because the goals are not time–specific. Eight weeks is too vague a time frame to be specific.
 
No, because the goals are not measurable. There is no way to measure whether a person's mobility in tennis has improved by 25%.


For the first question:

No because only a business major would be stupid enough to make an investment decision based solely on 3-4 of a person's qualitative traits

For the second question:

Mobility is not really well-defined here... so that leads me to believe it is the last answer. However, honestly, all of the answers seems as stupid as the question.
Go Back To Homework Help Topic List
Add Reply New Topic New Poll