In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, respond to one of these questions:

What judicial philosophy should guide the Supreme Court's exercise of judicial review?
Should the Supreme Court's power of judicial review be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment?


sry this just doesnt make sense to me the way its written can someone think of a way to re write it so it makes sense?

On what ideology should the supreme court use to decide whether a law/decision/thing is good or bad

Should the supreme court's power of judicial review be limited by an addition to the constitution (as opposed to left open as it is now - google loose/strict constitutionist)

What kind of judicial philosophy should be guiding the judgements done by Supreme Court?
Should there be a constitutional amendment that limits the power of judicial review done by Supreme Court?


I hope that helps you, english isn't my first language.

quite well expressed but personally i would slightly change the wording to:

What kind of judicial philosophy should be guiding the deliberations of the Supreme Court?
Should there be a constitutional amendment that determines the powers of the Supreme Court?