Quote (Indent @ Apr 22 2013 10:13pm)
Google scholar often produces mediocre results, because most of the items found are one websites that require membership and payment for articles and online books. Furthermore, it is a poor idea to cite information from a source you only have partial access to.
The best place to look is through a college/university database where articles and books are already owned, and are made available to students for free. It is the best resource available, and there should be scholarly. My university database flags articles have been peer-reviewed (pretty much all of them, and should be the case with yours), and this is what is significant.
This means that the paper/article/book has been through the academic arena, and has been harshly criticized by other experts – which is handed to people randomly – to look over and approve.
Have you used google scholar recently? I guess it may depend on which field. However, I'm in biology, and google scholar's searches are very reliable. In fact, my profs don't mind us using google scholar. The only problem is that it's out of date. If you use pubmed, you can get results from current year. However, google scholar won't give you new publications. The search results from google scholar are from peer-reviewed journals, including science, nature, gene, plant biology, etc. (just a few that I often come across). Also if you're on your school's server, or on your school's VPN, you can view the articles that your school gives you access to. If you're at home, there are still many results that you can view, ones that are free to the public. Many of the older literatures will not be open to the public, but many of the newer ones (2000 later) are as they can choose to publish to the public online when they submit their articles.