d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Player vs. Player Archive > 1v1 Ladder Tour Discussion
Prev1101112131431Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 1,770
Joined: Dec 7 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2010 01:58pm
Quote (JsV @ May 19 2010 08:56pm)
Cause you don't know of the strategys vs sorcs atm
I personally just think medi should be allowed IF something against assa/nec/dudu (since if they really play defensive a hdin wont win a single round)


what do you mean m8?

ps : nec vs hdin, nec ALWAYS plays def, so basically medi won't help the hdin but just makes the duel last longer, imo it shouldn't be allowed vs necs. maybe druids, definitely not vs assa (why should it, druids are handicaped vs sins aswell and we do nothing to help them?)
Member
Posts: 28,561
Joined: Nov 26 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
May 19 2010 01:59pm
Quote (Tertiairisation @ 19 May 2010 20:58)
what do you mean m8?

ps : nec vs hdin, nec ALWAYS plays def, so basically medi won't help the hdin but just makes the duel last longer, imo it shouldn't be allowed vs necs. maybe druids, definitely not vs assa (why should it, druids are handicaped vs sins aswell and we do nothing to help them?)


smite/foh tactic
hdin > es sorc
Member
Posts: 1,770
Joined: Dec 7 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2010 01:59pm
Quote (Jason_Voorhees @ May 19 2010 08:59pm)
smite/foh tactic
hdin > es sorc


are you being serious? been a while out of d2 but still lol, last time I checked, sorcs were still over hdins ^^
Member
Posts: 28,817
Joined: Oct 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
May 19 2010 02:00pm
Quote (Tertiairisation @ 19 May 2010 20:58)
what do you mean m8?

ps : nec vs hdin, nec ALWAYS plays def, so basically medi won't help the hdin but just makes the duel last longer, imo it shouldn't be allowed vs necs. maybe druids, definitely not vs assa (why should it, druids are handicaped vs sins aswell and we do nothing to help them?)


Smite/foh stomp blabla you've probably been retired to long to have seen it
what, i mean in extreme cases such if nec just tele aways as soon as pala comes into screen
Member
Posts: 28,561
Joined: Nov 26 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
May 19 2010 02:00pm
Quote (Tertiairisation @ 19 May 2010 20:59)
are you being serious? been a while out of d2 but still lol, last time I checked, sorcs were still over hdins ^^


ya i can show u how it works if you want
euro or d2pk, w/e
Member
Posts: 32,368
Joined: Feb 2 2007
Gold: 299.18
May 19 2010 02:00pm
Quote (JsV @ 19 May 2010 22:56)
Cause you don't know of the strategys vs sorcs atm
I personally just think medi should be allowed IF something against assa/nec/dudu (since if they really play defensive a hdin wont win a single round)


so should sorcs be not allowed to use es against necs? nec wont probably win a single round otherwise
and should ghost not be allowed to whirl against druid? druid wont probably win a single round either
or trap shouldnt be allowed to mb against a ghost becouse ghost wont win otherwise?
hammer shouldnt be allowed to use holy shield against barbs?
I could keep going on this list for so much longer, but I guess you get my point^^

the rules shouldnt be made to let hammers have a chance against all chars lol, other chars dont have that either
Member
Posts: 1,770
Joined: Dec 7 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2010 02:01pm
Quote (JsV @ May 19 2010 09:00pm)
Smite/foh stomp blabla you've probably been retired to long to have seen it
what, i mean in extreme cases such if nec just tele aways as soon as pala comes into screen


you can still beat a nec playing very def, really. i'd say a nec running into hardlines of bone spirits is harder to win than a tele-away nec. besides you hit him twice = he's dead, which is not the case of es sorcs who can take a number of unlimited hits if they manage to get away and get their mana to 100%.

anybody has a video showing this smite/foh tactic? i'd like to see that. I suppose foh is going to put the sorc in fhr mode, followed by a quick tele-on-top from hdin right?

Quote (Jason_Voorhees @ May 19 2010 09:00pm)
ya i can show u how it works if you want
euro or d2pk, w/e


I have no sorc, but later on I'd be glad to see how it works, sure ;)

This post was edited by Tertiairisation on May 19 2010 02:03pm
Member
Posts: 28,817
Joined: Oct 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
May 19 2010 02:02pm
Quote (tudey @ 19 May 2010 21:00)
so should sorcs be not allowed to use es against necs? nec wont probably win a single round otherwise
and should ghost not be allowed to whirl against druid? druid wont probably win a single round either
or trap shouldnt be allowed to mb against a ghost becouse ghost wont win otherwise?
hammer shouldnt be allowed to use holy shield against barbs?
I could keep going on this list for so much longer, but I guess you get my point^^

the rules shouldnt be made to let hammers have a chance against all chars lol, other chars dont have that either


wall of rage tl;dr :)
And i didn't tell them to take away all that? I'm obviously fine with no medi as its just the better for me, though if someone would abuse the healing auras on this way I dont think it would be that hard to proove it :S
Member
Posts: 28,817
Joined: Oct 13 2007
Gold: 0.00
May 19 2010 02:03pm
Quote (Tertiairisation @ 19 May 2010 21:01)
you can still beat a nec playing very def, really. i'd say a nec running into hardlines of bone spirits is harder to win than a tele-away nec. besides you hit him twice = he's dead, which is not the case of es sorcs who can take a number of unlimited hits if they manage to get away and get their mana to 100%.

anybody has a video showing this smite/foh tactic? i'd like to see that. I suppose foh is going to put the sorc in fhr mode, followed by a quick tele-on-top from hdin right?


Ok.. I disagree but whatever people think diffrent..
Member
Posts: 1,770
Joined: Dec 7 2009
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 19 2010 02:04pm
Quote (JsV @ May 19 2010 09:02pm)
wall of rage tl;dr :)
And i didn't tell them to take away all that? I'm obviously fine with no medi as its just the better for me, though if someone would abuse the healing auras on this way I dont think it would be that hard to proove it :S


it is always a source of conflicts and you know that jeppe.

the guy who you accuse of abusing will just answer

"look, he sits in 5 traps = i medi"

what are you going to say? how are you going to define the loser/winner? It's hard to judge really.

Quote (JsV @ May 19 2010 09:03pm)
Ok.. I disagree but whatever people think diffrent..


talking about my own solid experience of playing hdin during years that's why. not pretending im right though

This post was edited by Tertiairisation on May 19 2010 02:04pm
Go Back To Player vs. Player Archive Topic List
Prev1101112131431Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll