Just seems to be a lot of people on McGregors nuts, so wanted to get some answers to this Poll Question I have spitefully created. Like the judges arent ordered to give close rounds to someone. Not like its been that way for... well, ever. But it is what it is. Money makes the world go round!


Edit: Yes, I am saying Diaz won the second fight, no need for a trilogy, McGregor would just lose again..

This post was edited by curb on Dec 12 2017 02:16pm

Incredibly talented all around striker, poor defensive with alot lacking in a ground game
Overall 8/10

First off, reported, already thousands of mcgregor threads
Secondly, Conor either won the second fight or it was a draw.
Round 1 was conor
Round 2 conor did a lot of damage, Nate came on strong near the end, round to conor
Round 3 all Nate
Round 4 conor
Round 5 all Nate

Round 3 you could argue was 10-8 Nate

Holy shit.... a 2003 account? I didn't know people were still selling ones that old

Talented especially with his mouth, very good striker especially vs smaller and lighter fighters, poor defensive with alot lacking in a ground game
Overall 7/10

look into my eyes little man

he is very good at what he does. But he is not GSP/AndersonSilva/Jon Jones level.

Get the fuck out of here. Anderson Silva was what mcgregor is but worse on the ground. And he took steroids his whole career.

Aderson is wayyyyyyy better that dorkgregor on the ground. fyi he is a BB in jiu jitsu
He has subs over Hendo, Travis Lutter, Sonnen to name a few