yo fat lay off the med, ur holding alot of fg, cant afford for you to be in trouble atm bro, just let him talk his nonsense, his opinion doesnt mean shit here and he holds no authority here, and if things get out of hand mork is my good buddy and i'll tlk with him

Your confusing a mediator, with someone who actually has power / authority



Fatzero used logic

Its super effective!

NO, DONT CARE !

but having friends in high places is something worth having here

its prety much how i have 0 warn yet i stir up a shit ton of problems in every subforum, and actually they dnt gotta be member++ to have authority over us as well, we're only one step above scammers you know

There not used cuz it takes 45 mins to use one so that's a fail I ain't got 45 mins to wait so I find trustd ppl and have them do it

That's the point. I think it discourages many potential welchers if they have to wait 6 months for at least the possibility of scamming. The fact that we have set-in-stone rules for achieving 'Active' status sets up a rewards system where frequent bettors are rewarded through merit rather than sucking up. If you ask anyone that has PMed me about being put on the 'Active' list, I have made no exceptions to the requirements. This includes the now-mediator Fat-Zero, who (like everyone) was required to send me proof of his betting record.



Sure about that one?



He doesn't know our subforum's system, and I can't blame him, since I don't think he comes here that often.



My only issues with mediators have been waiting 30 minutes or more for a mediation, which I believe was already mentioned. This was back in my D2 playing days, which hasn't been for some time now.

I think it's important for us (all of us) to recognize that while we may have disagreements, I think we've set up a system that works well for this subforum. As the subforum gets larger, we'll inevitably have more problems, more disagreements, more welchers, etc... Let's be content with the fact that we're allowed to bet, despite the potential legal ramifications that could ensue.

I also personally voted "No" on this topic, we addressed not having a "Trusted" status in this thread, but again, nothing is set in stone.

Not really, I've been posting here before some actives even joined jsp so any newcomer could make little bets to make himself visible and then get away with the big sum.

Currently there is no accurate guidelines on who is active and who isn't

This post was edited by trebster on Aug 1 2010 12:55pm

i know where you're coming from, it'd just be an idea for people that are more trusted then normal actives ofc i dont mind if its denied i know who i trust on a personal level still

Or another example where a "trusted" tag could be useful is if a med retires.
say you get tired of medding bets, but you are still trustworthy enough to med your own bets.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 1 2010 04:32pm