No he was right, that was an amazingly uninspired and unimpressive fight against a guy who took it with only a week's notice.

There isn't any praise to be said for that fight.

i liked the striking and the ground game, the fight was fairly entertaining

Nate surprised me. I figured millers JJ was a lot better than his. Good win for Nate!

jim miller ......zzzzzzz

I just don't see entertainment in such a one-sided fight, but specifically when it's even LESS one-sided than it should be considering the circumstances.

I don't know what the hell is up with Marquardt lately

aaaaand now you can go and google how many years nate has had his bb more

He is no longer on the juice after getting busted, and he's following the "greg jackson gameplan"

Iran invade USA lol

He won the fight , he showed great sub d , and improved striking (well more variety at least).

that doesn't mean the end all of anything. there are lots of people who have had their belt less long than others who have better skills in the octagon.

i mean strictly by what jim miller has done inside the octagon compared to nate, I figured he had a good advantage. nate seems to more rely on his wrestling and size/power. I figured he was rusty.

haha edit, i meant dan miller. seeing jim on the tv I am getting backwards.

This post was edited by cmetc1999 on Mar 19 2011 09:15pm