Jon jones wasnt stripped for dodging the entire division.
And if you read, It says "first to be stripped of two belts"

Which is an inevitability at this point

It doesn't say first to be stripped for dodging. And jones has been stripped of more than 2. So by any logical argument he was the first to be stripped of 2....

stop insulting him

Sigh... do I have to spell everything out for you?
They obviously mean two belts in different divisions.
We can argue stupid details all night but the facts remain the same

Never defended
First to be stripped of two belts in two different divisions

This post was edited by xaos4ever on Feb 5 2018 11:24pm

RIP X2

what a savage

these Conor nuthuggers just dont get it do they

Thats no way to talk about you and your friends buddy.
I have no need for such insults.
Simple facts will suffice.

Never defended
Held 2 divisons hostage
First to be stripped of two belts.

Simple facts

Sigh I'm glad you can discern exactly what a random post on the internet meant because it fits what you want. Simple fact is it doesn't say 2 weight classes. It says two belts. Which he wasn't the first and you claimed as fact and are now back pedaling.

Journal update:

Day 721, Xaos is still trying to argue the same points about why he dislikes Conor

Will continue with updates as we progress more.

I guess you're incapable of cognitive thinking. Any true mma fan knows Jon has been stripped 3 times and would reason that the person who created the poster obviously didnt have enough room to type "first to be stripped of two belts in two different weight classes" but hey, not everyone can use deduction and logic to figure stuff out.

Good thing im here to help you out



Keeping a journal on me?
I love my fans

This post was edited by xaos4ever on Feb 6 2018 08:56am